Okay erika. You’re welcome to your opinion.
What you said is a petty emotional jab, and quite frankly it isn’t worth the time or effort. Past this comment, I have zero interest in getting into a pointless argument with you.
What I said stands and if that bothers you so much you need to try and come for me then I am more than happy to let you sit with your bad feelings and ignore you.
It’s not opinion. It’s a fact. NATO got basket because they were replying after central hull shot. Russian/chinese didn’t have this problem so they got autoloader.
Come on now Russian tanks have been getting away with not having turret baskets. You mess up a shot on an M1 you are going to damage the basket stopping the tank from doing anything.
You damage a T series autoloader it can and does still fight back. Russian mains need to learn to aim and should not rewarded with effectively a kill for hitting in general centre mass shots.
Game is not balanced right now and while the M1 is better the T-90M2 will have all the traits of a T-90M but with great reverse speed making it probably the best meta tank in the game.
Time to add turret baskets or jamming of the turret when the autoloader is damaged.
Getting away? They are the first to received the autoloader modules, the cassette has this part called hoist assembly which extend all the way up to the turret and the rammer is also modeled, so getting shot in the turret cheek or getting scalp will have a chance that the spalls destroys the hoist assembly, which will take out the autoloader altogether so even if you wanted to play hull down there is now a higher probability that you will get disabled since there is more parts to fail. They are all equally annoying situations.
Only thing I didn’t like about NATO vehicles is if two crews going to Valhalla the repair timer is longer than vehicles with max three crews lol
I know a bunch of good players that take full ammo in the Abrams. Hell they convinced me to do the same.
And some of these people are not even in the same universe as either of us seperate and combined in terms of skill level.
No sorry Gaijin now punish any player who is ever screwed over by RNG you shoot them in the side they can still shoot back I cannot because I have a turret basket. And as the game is CQB knife fighting you do not get the chance to repair, your shot may get eaten by the autoloader and engine killing the driver etc their shot cripples your tank and their 2nd shot kills you.
Russian tanks are currently the only ones that can fight back after one shot and it is clear Gaijin want to keep Russian tanks this way. While yes M1A2 are superior to T-90/80 etc the turret basket is crippling a single 30mm apds round can disable an M1 but will do nothing to any T series tank.
Baskets were only added because Russian mains only shoot centre mass and they would miss Leopard 2 key components so now instead it is only NATO nations that have this huge disadvantage.
Yeah I got convinced later, this was an old convo.
I still don’t do it, which would be cool if they’d properly implement the change in weight.
But yeah - I am definitely not any where near those dudes in terms of skill. They built different.
I’m so tired of breaking this myth. Oh look what I did? Fought back after shot?
What components?
Point stands you get hit centre mass you dont have a way to fight back. Because of the turret basket.
Someone hitting your tank with a bad shot does not disprove it. RNG is a factor and a tank without a basket is harder to disable.
Crew breach like every other tank before modules the issue was the Leopard had too much internal space. Guess what though now your crappy shot would disable that Leopard all thanks to Turret baskets!
You have a way to fight back. You just ignore it
It wasn’t like every other tanks. Russian/chinese MBTs were getting one tapped
In what way it’s crappy shot?
Then just play the T-90M and T-80 more often. Play whatever’s stronger, haha.
In the way you shot straight at the front plate.
If that was a Russian tank you wouldnt have even penetrated.
But that is the double standards Gaijin impose.
No round can defeat the Russian ERA at top tier. Now if you had gone for the turret ring
You would have destroyed the breach and likely killed the tank.
We are back to Russian mains dont want to aim for weakspots. Its point and click.
Damn, i must be doing something wrong when i play russia, i can never just point and click.
I really don’t know how these people can hold so much arrogancy to not understand something so simple about concepts behind Gaijin balance of mbts
Probably so that Russian MBTs like the BVM and 90M remain average at best as they currently are and not straight up garbage.
Really? 3BM60 goes through the front of any NATO tank in game.
So yeah point and click as you dont need to aim for weakspots.
Only a matter of time before the 90M2 gets added and is hands down the best tank in the game.
With the limited firepower of the T-90M?
Yeah no, the SEPv3 and 2A7s will always remain better than the T-90M2 by a comfortable margin, although it will give Russia an actually solid top tier MBT.