Spike missiles cannot penetrate the roof of the T-90M Arena. But that doesn’t matter, since the T-90M has an APS. And the Bushmaster cannon has become completely useless. Even from the rear, it can barely penetrate the engine.
Ofc, the WR in GSB dropped from 74 to mere 69%. :D
7 Likes
15 page bug reports about M1A2 SEPv3’s hull armor are rejected because “no enough info”.
But then, Relikt is buffed because… because… why not?
12 Likes
Average russia buff:
11 Likes
Russian tricks. The armor doesn’t change, but it changes, but in essence nothing changes, but it changes.
absurd - illogical - bias - bizarre - unhinged - delusion - surreal - senseless - irrational
People are asking for:
Leclerc rework/buff - they get a enormous FCS that gets destroyed by .50-caliber rounds
Taking the Abrams platform evolution into account - they’re getting a half-baked product, just to get it over with
Filling out the tech trees of minor nations - they get useless platforms with the Bushmaster and more and more vehicles for the USSR and the US, and of course the USSR must have the best tank, the best SPAA, the best CAS, and the best heli with made-up ammunition
Spike rework – they get the Relic armor upgrade, which further counters the Spike, while the USSR gets a powerful ATGM with an ammo box
And so on, and so on.
Creating a better game should be their priority, and in my opinion, it’s been getting worse and worse since the first implementation of the turret basket.
13 Likes
Yea Gaijin keep pointing to “because the document doesnt say better by how much” like ofc the sources we give wont say the % increase in armor effectiveness because it is a classified info. You are never ever going to find it, and even if you did, it is classified and Gaijin wont accept it.
So knowing Gaijin, they will write a paragraph saying how the new hull armor isnt good and give SEPv3 the worst possible % increase despite the almost 10 ton weight increase over the SEPv2
3 Likes
On the live server, you’re aiming at a spot where there’s no relict…
3 Likes
That ugly shade of green on the pictures is actually not just for decoration you know.
5 Likes
That is literally decoration since there is no relict plate on spot he choose.
So youre both fixating on where he put the crosshair instead of looking at the protection map?
2 Likes
Yeah because it can be easily manipulated he pressed “Consider camera verical angle” on dev screen and removed it on live.
2 Likes
Best part is, EVEN if you give them EXACT numbers, they still ignore them.
Gaijin simply has various “lines of defense” to reject a report.
For 3 years has Gaijin been aware that the SEPs are missing 250% extra CE protection in the turret.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ULvSC60SVBFw
First, “not a report”.
Then, “not enough info”.
Then, “not enough specific info”.
Then, “accepted, now it will die in a limbo”.
6 Likes
Both the dev and the live are free to use. If you feel like he falsified here then how about you proof him wrong?
1 Like
in before it turns out the bug reporting is a psy op to amass secret documents
(joking… not really…)
Evidence is literally on his screenshot. Im not going to spare space on PC for this kind of cheap triks
Abrams just get heavier and heavier with nothing to show for it lmao
2 Likes
he is looking at it from the same vertical angle? those few degrees error won’t cause this big of a leap in armor effectiveness
2 Likes
