Good thing we have prior evidence of it
And reported to the relevant authorities?
1 Like
improving the Abrams’ armor requires a doctoral level of expertise in materials science and physics.
but Russian tank only needs a single page from the manufacturer’s brochure.
13 Likes
Wdym “now”??
After you dominate for more than half a year its “fixed now”??
Nah man this is not how it is XD, you cant just start saying thats its other players fault for not killing it for the past 7 months when it got fixed recently lmao
Not only that, I love how they threw the blog after the dev closed, its like they are putting us under the image that there is nothing we can do and we have to accept it lol
It’s been like that ever since he moved up from the BR.
1 Like
I was referring to this abrams (the one in the photo that i have posted below)
Would love to see their excuse
1 Like
Still no photos released so I wonder if they had the Improved Turret Motor by the time of FY22 trials.
Spoiler
3 Likes
This is precisely what I don’t like, the standards are ridiculous, the consistency of the historical report denials varies on whether or not the nation in question wants to maintain a level of secrecy to their military material.
2 Likes
Sure man
“uh we uh uhhhhh forgot”
2 Likes
we have the photos pal your getting jail time
2 Likes
This really highlights the sorts of double standards at play. General Lee made a fairly good video looking at Gaijin’s selective approach at what needs to be as realistic as possible and what they are willing to fudge the numbers on, or bend their rules to allow. The hurdles NATO mains have to jump through to get things added or reworked seems a bit…silly. Highly recommend the video though.
14 Likes
ALL added weight that cause earlier maintenance to be needed becomes significant when talking large scale fleet deployment of multi million dollar equipment that doesn’t take an afternoon to fix once broken.
1 Like
Ah my bad but yea when i was wanting the V3 i was begging for the fully kitted out version with the APS and the DU plates as seen in the picture
1 Like
Not just lee there’s a lot of these videos
I don’t doubt it. Just the most recent one Ive seen and thought was well presented.
The problem with this video is that it forgets when the double standard of realism applies to the NATO side as well, but we all know that if Russia is removed from the game, the game is fixed
1 Like
I think you misunderstand the meaning of significant in this scenario. Significant as in is it enough to actually affect design changes beyond “please don’t put 15 tons on the front of the tank”