Regarding the br of the adats and Tor-m1

Machinery of War Discussion Ground Vehicle
21

yeah you can also just list ways in witch the adats is worse,

  1. the irst /tv tracker comes at the cost of having no radar tracker meaning the unlike every AA at the tier the adats cant 3rd person lock meaning you have to find and look directly at a target making it pretty bad at intercepting smaller fast moving targets like missiles
  2. you aslo cant lock through cloudy or foggy weather even if you can see the plane with your eyes until the plane is like 3km away
  3. combo that with the fact the search radar has a max vertical search angle of 18 degrees making it not only the worst at its tier but worse than the radar on the xm975 at 10.3 br making it the easiest AA to climb over at the br.
  4. the dead zone is once again a tradeoff for having way better range than the adats as the missile pretty much become useless and uncontrollable past 6-7km

so yes the adats has some advantages like no launch warning or smoke trail but is worse in more ways than its good when it comes to being an actual AA vehicle and can definitely be the same br as the torm1 and should be

1 Like
22

I don’t think TOR-M1 is better than ADATS, that’s my attitude, and that’s why we told you it should be lower that adats

23

well your free to be as wrong as you like

1 Like
24

Self-righteousness is not a good thing.

25

If you want to compare ADATS to other nations SPAA (in AA capability) 2S6 Tunguska are more suitable competitor (even though 2S6 are at 10.7). With ADATS having a bit better Missiles but worst AA Gun and worst thermal .
Though ADATS has nerf Radar (should be able to detect drone) and its aiming sight should have stabilizer (only aiming sight have stabilizer but gun/Missiles launcher didn’t have stabilizer from ADATS topic)