Yeah, it’s only gonna get worse with ARH incoming.
2 Likes
Yeah it’s kinda demotivating, but unfortunately that’s all we can do… Maybe if we get enough attention gaijin will at least have EC on their list of possible additions.
If you do you’ll have full support from me and my buddies, it’s not much but it’s something lmao
3 Likes
Y’all did it, congratz :D
1 Like
Not perfect, but better than nothing
2 Likes
Enabling the option for smaller matches should only find you small matches, with zero chance of 16v16. It’s an option afterall, it’s not forcing anyone to use it.
2 Likes
Just add différent spawn and always in the bigger maps. Gaijin need to focus on a new system of battle, a new gameplay. Something between Simulation and RB, like a PvPvE in Simulator maps with PvE objectives and waves to protect, escort (fox 3 can be very usefull there). ANd maybe like in Squadron battle with no ping and name above 1km for an exemple.
1 Like
give me some of your DMT that youre smoking because you are not in this current reality dawg
2 Likes
He likes to troll, don’t give him much attention
We are in 2025 and the game still shit looking like a zoo, no skill expression, only 1vs5.
Gaijin just dont care
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Guess what? You’re still facing 8 AIM-120s regardless of lobby size.
Your team reduces in size as well, thus the amount of missiles you face stays the same.
Also 16v16 isn’t status quo, 12v12 and 8x8 were.
The reason I stopped playing 5.7 air was cause it was 8v8.
1 Like
I also often play 4.0-6.0, but I can always enter into 12v12 or 16v16 (in most cases) lobbies. You can turn off the option to enter into small lobbies to avoid entering into 6v6 or 8v8 lobbies as much as possible.
You have mistakenly applied the idea of averaging here. If the number of players decreases, the density of missiles will decrease throughout the entire map (the map size remains unchanged), and players who grind for modification will have more opportunities to survive in the first wave of attacks, which will greatly increase their gaming experience. In addition, regardless of whether the big or small lobby is better, overwhelming public opinion polls at least represent that players should have the opportunity to freely choose the size of the lobby.
2 Likes
It is right now.
That has been fixed, but it wasn’t bad due to 8v8. It was bad due to poor balance and ju-288 spam leading to boring and imbalanced matches.
I just want less player density since that will lead to less imbalanced matches, and longer matches.
1 Like
I believe that changing from 16v16 to 8v8 will double the number of lobbies, allowing for better application of new matchmakers in top tier lobbies. For example, each br aircraft will only be matched with an equal br aircraft (such as 13.7 fighting 13.7, ensuring that their overwhelming Fox3 will not be used to bully 12.7 aircraft). If it’s not possible, it can at least help us go from ± 1.0 to ± 0.7 or smaller.
We need top tier enduring confrontation with tanks, planes and eventually top tier naval(when modern stuff is added.)