Hell yeah, Canada will become stronger! 🇨🇦🇨🇦🍁🇨🇦🇨🇦🍁🇨🇦🇨🇦
1 Like
No :)
1 Like
No?
The user i replied to asked if the changes had already been made (and has also previously asked when these changes will be implemented).
Ohhhh
I know, but what I mean is it’s not SA line anymore its something else, like light tank line
This foldering stuff seems dubious.
Why don’t you instead folder M109A1 with G6 and the FV4005 with Conway?
They are similar in chasis/armament and in playstyles and are not that far away in BR.
2 Likes
I am in the Commonwealth and I hate that Gaijin seems to think it’s some military alliance. It’s not.
Had to add the most famous F-111, of course. No one gave the F-111 the respect it deserved like the Aussies.
Aight, fella. Lets not go too far. 1999 referendum failed, but you’re making us sound like some colony. We only participate in America’s dumb wars these days.
well i believe the Commonwealth county’s should be in the same nation because the have the same design bureau the same with the Ukrainians tanks should go in the Ussr.
But they don’t? Ukraine (minus tanks donated in the ongoing conflict) are of USSR design. Australia hasn’t had anything to do with British designs for a long time - opting for US based designs for vehicles/jets for decades now, and even French designs before that (Mirage III and (dud) MRH-90 Taipan). WW2 stuff? sure. And of course, India with its T-90 and SU-30MKI and all the other Russian/US/French/Israeli gear are not of the same design bureau again. Out of all the reasons to group Commonwealth nations in one tree, a common design bureau is the least realistic.
As controversial as it is Aussie and Canadian vehicles basically go wherever gaijin decides.
Believe me. I would love it if it was all under one tree but it probably won’t be.
If they gave the Canadian Leo and Aussie Abrams to England it would pave the way for Israel to get the additional Merkava variants. Which I personally love. However, they probably won’t.
2 Likes
Yes, adding vehicle models to events and then removing their original tech tree and not being able to include them there seems like a huge planning failure to me. Similarly to when they listed vehicles that entered production and combat in significant numbers as limited-event tanks and couldn’t be purchased.
I have the Merkava Mk1, the Mk2B (Late), and the 3D in the US tech tree, and I wouldn’t hesitate to move them to the Israeli tech tree if possible. Similarly, I had the Magach 3 in the US tech tree and the Shot Kal Dalet in the UK tech tree. They were later added to the Israeli tech tree, so I had to buy them again because I wanted to use them in their original tech tree.
Gaijin in these types of situations should give players the opportunity to choose where to leave those vehicles, so that whoever wants them in the old tech tree can leave them, and whoever wants to change them to put them in their national tech tree, can change them.
1 Like
I wouldn’t be surprised to see a 2A4 or 2A6 in UK for next update
1 Like
yea i agree with you and that’s a good part because its add variety, i know personally that a lot of Australians don’t like the idea being under the British so its your choice to decide i believe that gaijin should put in a vote for only Australians players where there country should go.
2 Likes
Australia already have 14 vehicles in the uk tree and one in the us, i think it is already decided where they’re going.
3 Likes
It’s where we belong.
3 Likes
Which was why I found India was an odd choice since Australia has already got a huge amount of vehicles in Britain
3 Likes
So in short, what they are doing is just merging the South African vehicles into the main tech tree in order to add more vehicles from other nations into the Great Britain tree. This is ridicules. Unless they are planning to rename the Great Britain tree to “The Commonwealth” tree, then the exact same thing should happen to Hungarian vehicles and Finnish vehicles.
There are still plenty of vehicles made by Britain or used by Britain that can be added, rather than more commonwealth ones being that its the British Tech Tree, and if this is a ploy to turn the tree into a commonwealth one primarily rather than a British tech tree, its a bit insulting towards the British players as it just puts them at the back of their own tree.
Abbot, Scimitar 2, Scorpion, AJAX, Priest, Sexton, Bishop, Cavalier, Centaur, Humber AC, Covenanter
Among some of the vehicles that should be added, rather than other nations vehicles.
The fact that Gaijin are focusing on other nations vehicles rather than the British ones that are still wanted/needed in the British tech tree is frustrating. Lets not even get into the multitude of bug reports for the top tier British vehicles that haven’t been sorted yet. I’m looking at you, Stormer HVM and Challenger 2.
South Africa should have its own line within the British tech tree, and not be merged into it. The same as Hungary in the Italian tech tree. Or Finland in the Swedish tech tree. If Gaijin merge it and call it “The Commonwealth”, then Sweden should be renamed “Scandinavia” and Italy should be renamed to “Southern Europe” because its the only way it makes sense to do this.
TL;DR
Don’t merge south africa into the british tech tree. Leave them with their own line, or better yet, make use of the research table and give them their own tab at the top, like how we have “Bluewater Fleet”, “Helicopters”, etc. We could have a new tab on the British forces called “South African Ground” or “Indian Ground” or “Canadian Ground” where those vehicles can go.
Yet again, opting to not add more British used/made vehicles in their own tech tree and instead prepping for more of other nations vehicles.
1 Like
They are just recognising SA as a Commonwealth nation and the sub tree branch is now a Commonwealth branch. This isn’t really unique, France got Benelux as a single sub tree and that’s 3 nations as one sub tree.
1 Like