RDF-LT and HSTVL

Machinery of War Discussion Ground Vehicle
,
23

Gaijin just has an incredibly strong bias and treat vehicles very differently from eachother. Stryker MGS should have 6sec reload but is still stuck with 7.5sec

Also kinda funny how the AGS with the same reload mechanism has a 5 second reload…

24

I’ve recently found dimensional diagrams of 4 variants the xm885 prototypes. AAAC-I, 2 versions of AAAC-II, and the original AAI design that used the 2lb penetrator. The 2lber is the one that could pen single heavy, but not triple heavy.

I’ll be adding those to an existing report on our tracking system.

8 Likes
25

Thank you

26

Any updates with this? Really tired of leopards just laughing off shots to the side and t80 era just completely eating shots.

Heck I will model them for free if that would expedite fixing M885

27

Leave Spookston to do that, as he know the most one everything on that program. Not trying to offend you but Gaijin will let a homeless man from Kenya that has never seen a lightbulb remodel anything in this game before they listen to the community or let them help.

This comment is going to be taken down as they know I’m right and by taking this down they admit I’m right

1 Like
28

tipical usamain skill issue

1 Like
29

Typical Gaijin got US wrong again issue.

1 Like
30

Some questions I have:

  • Were these variants developed sequentially or in parallel?
    – If sequentially, what was the finalized variant?
    – If in parallel, what were the outcomes of each of them? Did one of them get selected?

  • In reports, articles, etc, they mentioned Delta 3 and XM885.
    – When different sources mentioned them, are they talking about the same thing?
    – Is one of the variants presented Delta 3, or was it a completely different design?

  • Did the HSTV-L test all four of those variants?

  • What does this mean in game?

31

All this can be answered by watching Spookston’s video on them
Here go listen and learn
https://www.youtube.com/@Spookston

32

The fact that htvs-l didn’t get an ammo box with its anemic 26 round capacity is mind boggling but not surprising.

33

So M774 is over-performing according to you…
198 /cos 60 = 396mm of penetration at 2000 meters.
image

Prove that M774 should be nerfed.

Thank you @Caernarvon02 for bringing his error to my attention.

@stangbro01
26 rounds is more than enough in a match.

34

Can’t do that, APFSDS do slightly better than that so … 343 is correct even if 198 is also correct, that’s why they rejected a couple of documents from Chinese and Russian communities because they are all done with angle and not flat, so doesn’t help them get the actual pen correct.

35

rolled armor is about 25% weaker than cast armor IIRC

36

All i did was ask for proof of OPs claim that it should be superior to L23 on the Challenger 1/ chieftain.

LMFAO pls bug report that

37

What’s there to bug report? I have no evidence that 396mm at 2000 meters is incorrect.

38

I seem to have misread ignore me

39

Meanwhile Su-33 missing its surface missiles

40

I thought CHA is like 95% as effective as RHA?

41

RHA is stronger

42

cast can have air bubbles and impurites inside of it when its cast that’s why its weaker, rolled if made in a way that most of those are removed before its finished