I suspect you mean A2’s? And we had them fielded way longer than 06.
Nope I mean A4’s
Basically the M16 with Picatinny rail systems and detachable carrying handle / iron sight rears.
I’m familiar, carried one till I was forced to turn it over for an M4A1 in 16.
As stated, I think your dates were off. I didn’t even get an A4 till after 06.
Were you marines or army? Army got rid of the A2’s in replacement for the A4’s. Last of our A4’s came off the books for issue outside of spare inventory in Nov / Dec 2007 that I recall outside of some NG units.
1 Like
If Gaijin makes any attempt to fix the Comanche at all, it will be 6-8 months down the line at earliest.
Army (full time) Guard
I think that was the initial goal, but intentions / what happened was not always the same. Went in with the first push of ACU’s in 05.
I was dropping off guys in combat (though not infantry) carrying A2’s in 05-06. My last deployment was 10, and we had support guys with A4’s then (as well as DMR’s if they didn’t want the EBR abortion)
Didnt you love the ACU’s. When I got out I had BDU, DCU, ACU, and Multicam (before they switched it to the MCP or whatever). I am just glad they didnt go through with the ACU improvement adding poo brown into it.
1 Like
They could just copy paste the armor from the dev server to live server
1 Like
Yep, Air BDU, the tan 2 piece flight suits, DCU, ACU, Scorpion and Multicam
Along with greens, blues (2 different sets) and now pinks & greens 🤣🙄
given the RAH-66 has the longbow radar isnt it eligable to receive the AGM-114L Longbow hellfire?
They really went full identity crisis for a while. I remember looking at the Blues and knowing I had to bite the bullet and get them at some point, the cost alone left me wishing they would just stick with the greens. So glad I was long gone before they decided that the Blues weren’t enough, that now they needed to harken back to WWII uniform thinking with the Pinks and Greens
1 Like
While there is no information publicly available for the rest of the Comanche armor, I did find some about the tail section and made a bug report. I don’t expect it to be accepted but we’ll see
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/WhX3S6dc7tX0
Bumping this here so that it doesn’t get forgotten.
Community Bug Reporting System.
The post was “accepted” and then “closed”. As of today, the Comanche still employs the obsolete AGM-114B.
Also made a new post with reference to the current version of the game. I’ll leave it here, hoping it will not be removed.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/0kEkF6JA5vLK
Hit that “I have same issue” button.
These sources are not accepted yet more than half of modern vehicles in game have stats that are literally made up or based on sources like brochures and advertisements on military magazines LMAO, this company man…
https://community.gaijin.net/p/warthunder/i/o3LtfgaB14jX?comment=fEbEyaHenYpjlIgNACzHyIBm
The hypocrisy of these bug managers is hysterical.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/k9MVurZNy798
I’ve sat here and read quite a few bug reports to see how these managers operate.
1 Like
Anyone who has been here for more than a month know how it works. You can write down “T80 UFP 8,000,000 mm ERA enfused armor planned” and because it is russian, gaijin will input it in the game.
After seeing their implementation of their new magically fake battleship, I am worried my jokes from years ago about them making IS-7’s 1.3 BR is actually a possibility if the right person gets into place
All jokes aside, lets keep it on topic. I’m sure Stona is breathing hard with his finger on the close thread button.
How can you show that something doesn’t exist if it doesn’t exist???
you cant
sufficent evidence would be a document satting that devlopment was canceled/ halted
exactly, yet you need to do if for gaijob to remove the blatantly fake KH-38MT