In perfect conditions without knowing the target? That irst has like no stats. Also that’s just off a pilot statement which gaijin doesn’t take
and that’s still not players fault.
It’s Gaijin Dev comitee that doesn’t allow buffs to come for others,…
1 Like
It is when every time a Typhoon bug report is submitted. The French mains try ot argue against it. Heck. We deliberately didnt mention a number of reports to try and avoid it being spammed with nonsense counter arguments that have derailed previous reports.
Thank god, Mutala is banned
Does statshark have all player statistics?
as we have many UK/US Russian mains trying to kill french ones,… that’s Bug-report war.
HOWEVER, Techmods don’t care about it, and accepts bug reports aslong as they’re filling every cirteria in the checklist
after that, the IMPLEMENTATION is in Gaijin Devs Hands,… no matter what we players could say about it.
2 Likes
but that does not change the fact that everyone else is mad when the Rafale gets bug fixes after a report has been active for 2 weeks and the exact same report for another aircraft isnt fixed after 9 months
1 Like
still not player fault, unlike you were saying 2 post ago,…
you seem mad about something that have currently no impact on the Bug fixing procedure.
we can see here:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/YpGWWdfGT0jo
that Devs are the ones getting the last word anyway.
Also, when most (95%) nerfing reports against Rafale looks like that one:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/VD1pAraahdbx
there is like 0 chances to get nerfs on it.
FeetPics made a good one, and thanks to him, we might see a nerf for once.
and about EF-2000, it seems to be overperforming in 1 criteria:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/jAsZ8qqCgiuw
Large Caliber Flares
2 Likes
305km (190 miles) on an airliner sized target. In cloudy conditions.
It’s either pilot’s statements or the wind blowing. If they can use Iranian Media, they can use a verified pilot’s words.
except that from my experience, they don’t use either of them.
In before gajin lowers flare count.
If the EF has a better turn rate in real life than Raf… which is under/ over performing?
Raf best missle, best FM, best radar.
Exactly no point in playing any other TT jet at this point
Rafael definitely doesn’t have best fm in game anymore, that would go to eurofighter, but everything else sure
i’ve checked on many EF-2000 and Rafale Bug-reports, and respectfully:
“Quality of Reports Matters”
The pure checklist about sources, blocks a lot of reports, but also the “Plug-n-Play” quality of some reports are the one to get accepted and fixed the fastest.
And sadly, most EF-2000 reports aren’t as “plug-n-play” as most Rafale reports are.
That’s an observation i’ve made over 500 bug reports.
Now, raging about Rafale, without taking the time to make as good reports as the one done on Rafale, is simply not going to make EF-2000 any good.
Keep doing that,… and Rafale will continue to be as good as it is, if not better.
At least FeetPics understand how Bug Reports should be done.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/vBzbHgSGY6qS
Take it as exemple
1 Like
and missiles are still not at their best.
But that would be totally and completely undone if they fixed BOL:
Id trade 32 internal LCMs for 320 large calibre flares or slightly stronger than standard calibre chaff from the BOL pods.
So even if Fireball is correct on the count of itnernal large calibre flares. The Typhoon would still be massively underperforming in terms of CMs
Still underperforming loads though. Typhoon should have better ITR, STR, less weight (so better TWR), higher supercruise speed, better acceleration, etc etc
1 Like
If I remember right the only valid one was weight, everything else is unconfirmed just based off requirements for esr d
I cant recall what docs, but some people keep on fixating on some that are from 1987 which are wrong but there are actually more modern docs than those which are being used for the current reports.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/UzEsXa0vX05A
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/75Meg57oyRDW
for example
First bug report is using 1987 requirement as reference and assumes developer configured aircraft according to the EFA calculation. The plane in game is crazy configured according to the ESR-D requirement. And the thrust output for the EFA calculation Gunjob/Flame uses is debatable.
1 Like
so obvious that you completely ignored putting it into the first stat?
Also, it’s 44%.
until they, as I said, break.
Also prevents the F-14 sweeping it’s wings back so not a buff.
not exclusive to those issues.
The F-14’s design made it incredibly hard to recover from them too it would appear.
wasn’t talking about the F-14 here was I?
I was pointing out it sure as hell won’t take 13Gs irl, defeating your whole point of “the F-14 handles like real life”
that’s rich from someone who can’t speak badly of his precious tomcat.
Now, get this back to the rafale and it’s irl performance.
From people that I talked and from what I understand the reasoning for the weight reduction was kinda pulled outta the ass from sources that were connected, kinda like how squish once made (as a joke/making a point) of f-22 can have some insane thrust to weight. Ofc I didn’t really look into this report like some like bad karma or squish so I can’t conclusively say it was or not, but based off bad karmas community post it seems like they maybe over did it
1 Like