indonesia still has yet to become a proper subtree so not sure where this comes from.
this is fair, you’re 1 for 3 (even though he asked for 5 lol, kek even)
since you love father smin so much, i would expect you to know that smin has repeatedly covered the fact that Germany ordered the ECRS Mk.1, opposed to the Mk.2 ordered by the Italians and British.
ew the cringe kid has started talking…
Thats how ive felt with every message youve sent man 💔
sorry about that.
i will be more clear next time
There isnt a properly implemented subtree in the game
south africa is by far the best with some mediocre scout cars and a few good tanks. only one plane tho lol.
maybe one day subtrees will have some actual respect.
the AESA radar typhoons in the UK and Italy are representative of what their fleets are to be upgraded to in the future. Just as the german ones are, they just decided on a earlier mark of the AESA as they jumped the gun a bit.
as for PIRATE, unsure if the luftwaffe will adopt it. However the part is quite literally “plug and play” into the aircrafts computer systems. The initial decision to omit it was moronic, so its a no-brainer of an upgrade to the fleet.
Nice try but I asked for 5, you gave me 3. But let’s work with that!
What would the Rafale add to the Japanese tech tree when it already has TWO air sub trees and very decent critters both for A/A and A/G such as the 18D and Su-30, MAYBE even the Gripen…? Up to you.
What would R-73s add to the Russian tech tree when the Su-27 is right there, when the Su-34 is right there. Even so, you’re talking about the specific weaponry a plane carries, not a variant of it lol.
And sorry but Germany literally doesn’t operate that EFT. It’s like saying “Japan should the the F-15E” when Japan has F-15s just not the E variant lmao.
lets me start again
Ok dude, once again. It’s NOT that we don’t understand what he said or that we think it’s coming. We’re just pointing out inconsistecies throughout the game and our desire to have the twin seat variants added, how many times do we have to repeat ourselves.
It’s ok it might never get added, but we have the pass in this forum to discuss why and/or how it should be added, our desire for it in the US tree so on and so on, if you disagree with that… I’m sorry man, close this forum and leave us be lmfaoo, we won’t stop saying we wished the US got the twin seat hornets.
thanks
the abrams in the chinese tree is functionally identical so not really.
less wieght mean faster reaction no ?
missing F/A-18F/D to the US tree btw
repeat.
idek what this is trying to say
sure, but at the same time this is literally the first time i have heard of this request.
valid i guess but the GDR was a part of tv soviet union. We literally have an ENTIRE TREE dedicated to these vehicles, opposed to a single F/A-18F.
again, valid
Our right to be screwed over by gaijin shall not be infringed but we sure as hell can complain about it
that extra weight is from TUSK, which is best not to use. the SEP and T are the same weight without that modification.
50% of gdr army is missing.
Elaborate please
whoops, missed this. In terms of A2A, the F-16C-50 absolutely slams any other F-16.
For A2G, the Israeli ones are equipped with the SPICE bombs, something that the US does not operate.
