That’s like his thing.
just realized gaijin copy pastes?
I stopped playing this game due to russian bias, and poor implementation or lack of entire US system features. Came back for a couple rounds to see if they pulled their head out. They did not. War Thunder isn’t life for me, and the game currently isn’t in a state worth my money or time. So yes, I drop out of this game and return from time to time only to find the incompetence is still strong in development.
Phoenix (all generations) = still not working properly.
Aim-120s = still not working properly.
Abrams = still busted.
Russian vehicles = still getting miracle performance features, and even ammunition they never carried or got working.
So yes, I dip out because honestly my time is more valuable to me, and my money best spent on devs that aren’t pushing a fantasy agenda for russian bias on how they dream their vehicles perform instead of building vehicles that actually perform properly. We have enough data from the Ukraine war to stop playing pretend with this nonsense.
1 Like
skill issue
6 Likes
you think r27 is arh?
5 Likes
Although comparing the R-27ER and the AIM-120A wouldn’t yield any profitable results, as one of them is SARH and the other is ARH, which in this game is a huge advantage. If one were to compare them with similar situations (constant lock on target regardless of guidance type, same altitude, same speed, etc.), then the result you might get will be better; however, do not forget that an AIM-120A/B or any ARH missile in-game will almost always be better than a SARH missile. In the R-27ER’s case, if one were to need the whole Mach 5, then one could use it, though they’d need perfect conditions. However, in the AIM-120A’s case, you can always use the data link and lose lock in case you need to do evasive maneuvers. So basically, comparing these missiles won’t yield anything but trouble.
If in any fantastic and fabulous way the R-27EA were to be added (missiles that are half paper, half model, half everything), then if it were to be similar to the R-27ER’s specs, then a comparison would indeed be able to take place and be discussed, but as I said, the missile is nothing but some sort of prototype.
A pretty much inverted comparison, to how broken the EA it would be, btw.
They are apparently being considered according to a reliable leak which is terrofying to me, unless they are being considered for an equal to the Aim-120C5 that I dont think the soviets really have
1 Like
This is my main cope theory as well, everything else is the premature death of the 4th gen environment
2 Likes
Yeah, Su-30 with 10/12x R-27EA, would just be checkmate without other nations getting something better to fight back
Yeah, that’s why I mentioned them, but I don’t know why they’d introduce them in the game. I was told that Russia doesn’t have much to add when it comes to ARH missiles though, so maybe it’s because of that.
Yeah, Its basically R-77-1 to R-37 (iirc) and R-37 would just be insane to come anytime soon. Especially as it would mean skipping a lot of ARH missiles for the other nations too like Any other Aim-120 variant bar Aim-120D.
Still a terrofying thought.
Though I do still think R-27ERs are a potent threat even in the higher BRs if used right/at the right time. I reckon if I had the Su-30. Id be tempted to run 2x R-73, 2x R-27ET, 2x R-27ER 6x R-77-1 in ASB just to have a weapon for any situation.
1 Like
So you stopped because of a fiction you made up.
Soviet tanks exclusively use their inferior ammo to NATO counterparts.
There is no tank in War Thunder using ammo it physically cannot fire.
There remains zero Russian bias.
Then again, you lied about your military service for attention, so you’re at least decent at making stuff up.
[This has nothing to do with BRs. Anyone that brings up BRs are moving goalposts.]
I think Russia has the R-77M in between (Aim-120D counterpart). But almost nothing is known about it and it’s only been seen on the SU-57 and MiG-35
1 Like
Yeah, so no Aim-120C5 equivalent then
1 Like
Yeah, the good think about the R-27ERs (and the AIM-7Ps these days) us that you can change targets, so if the target either dies or the plane loses lock, you can re-lock if you’re fast enough, moreover, they’d get the RWR warning once (for the launch) amd then, if you lost lock, they would lose the RWR contact, the moment you re-lock them, they wouldn’t know a missile is going towards them as they haven’t gotten a launch warning. Mind that for example, with the AIM-7Ms, you need to maintain lock so you’d get a lock warning succeded by a luanch warning, and when you lose the lock warning you can consider youself safe from the last missile. So yeah, R-27ERs are wuite good.
1 Like
Yeah, and I think that is why people sometimes confuse them with ARH. Used right they are deadly. I hated dealing with Mig-29s in the F3 for an entire year
3 Likes
there is one tank ingame that uses ammo it cannot load maybe is able to fire the round.T-72AV Turms-T its a A model 72 that has 3BM42 from all i know the 72A models are unable to load this round so you are wrong
So how is 3BM60 inferior to M900, or 3BM42 to M774?
R-77-1…
But snails can’t model grill grates.