What?!
That what you must proof.
Identify yourself correctly (your problem), and send your photo with diploma and passport.
That will be enough.
Or else…
You cant read.
Many people tried to prove same to dcs developers, but nobody succeeded
You didnt provide historical proofs.
Apparently, the holy wars for launching ET without PR are ready to flare up again. For hotheads, I repeat that this topic was already discussed a couple of years ago and for quite a long time. No arguments or references to a direct indication of the need for “capture on the carrier’s suspension” worked - their own fabrications seemed more important.
Even DCS devs.
1 Like
In theory.
Game must be done as theory, yes?
Might be worser to you.
Yes lol.
Our f-16s are programmed on each flight with a special module for the sortie.
You… think aircraft are like glass cannons dont you lol?
1 Like
Bringing data from stores and to them - some different thing.
Man stop.
Seriously.
Its nearly the same.
Its probably more effective and tbh theres no point to this argument.
1 Like
Any changes can cause damage, thats electronics.
What does the “new radar” on those MiGs have to do with the radars on the SM and SMT models?
So, flat cap and cone cap also nearly the same?
Modern aircraft (and not-so-modern ones as well) are programmed before flight. However, this pertains to mission data rather than a change in software.
3 Likes
Because that’s what it says in the user manual.The R-27EP was not exported.Therefore, it is not available on export aircraft
1 Like
bruh.
time is a change.
wind speed, gravity, number of people thinking about you changes
1 Like
i never argued that they were man. stop bothering me
and in many modern aircraft, mission data includes weapons carried.
it doesnt take any physical change to try a variant of a previously compatible weapon.
1 Like
R-27EA missile didn 't go further than the prototype .The work was curtailed in favor of the R-77
2 Likes