R-77s are horrid and the R-77-1 is needed

Machinery of War Discussion Aircraft
4

Why only soviet must new missile?
Why not everyone, at least that in game files already?

14 Likes
5

The R-77-1 is already in the game files, and the AIM-120C-5 is worlds better than it

6 Likes
6

I’ve seen people say that the R-77 got modeled correctly, in real life its also bad.

15 Likes
7

Nothing is every going to be perfectly balanced.

1 Like
8

I agree, that’s why I hope they add the R-77-1 instead of trying to buff the current R-77.

3 Likes
9

But they could atleast TRY

2 Likes
10

It is very bad in wt because of altitude, where fights are
Fins just doing very bad for missile, on that alts.

11

Sustainer might help, but not a lot.

12

and players could also try to adapt to what they have access too

13

Better than not having one. After than initial burn the R-77 just becomes crippled

14

True, but BVR is a fun aspect of the game and a whole country not having adequate access to that is just not fun.

15

You have the R-27ER dont you?

16

Idk, 120C-5 might be added in pair with 77-1 after patch/few

1 Like
17

I don’t know what to tell you, R-77-1 addition is gonna break the game, that’s why its gonna be added later on with bunch of missiles so the game stay competitive.

3 Likes
18

Which again will get you at most a trade because AIM-120As don’t require a lock to track

19

Wow, amraams on Tornado so bvr…
Derby and darter also not good, but you crying only about 77.

3 Likes
20

Why would the R-77-1 break the game? It’s not that much more advanced and still has less range than the AIM-120A

4 Likes
21

So, your looking for an advantage since the one you had with the R-27ER was taken away and cant cope with having to change tactics?

10 Likes
22

Basicly not big difference, but just add 120C-5 together, will be fine

23

Thats Russian’s Engineers fault, they thought about more drag instead of range.

7 Likes