Nothing is every going to be perfectly balanced.
1 Like
I agree, that’s why I hope they add the R-77-1 instead of trying to buff the current R-77.
3 Likes
But they could atleast TRY
2 Likes
It is very bad in wt because of altitude, where fights are
Fins just doing very bad for missile, on that alts.
Sustainer might help, but not a lot.
and players could also try to adapt to what they have access too
Better than not having one. After than initial burn the R-77 just becomes crippled
True, but BVR is a fun aspect of the game and a whole country not having adequate access to that is just not fun.
You have the R-27ER dont you?
Idk, 120C-5 might be added in pair with 77-1 after patch/few
1 Like
I don’t know what to tell you, R-77-1 addition is gonna break the game, that’s why its gonna be added later on with bunch of missiles so the game stay competitive.
3 Likes
Which again will get you at most a trade because AIM-120As don’t require a lock to track
Wow, amraams on Tornado so bvr…
Derby and darter also not good, but you crying only about 77.
3 Likes
Why would the R-77-1 break the game? It’s not that much more advanced and still has less range than the AIM-120A
4 Likes
So, your looking for an advantage since the one you had with the R-27ER was taken away and cant cope with having to change tactics?
10 Likes
Basicly not big difference, but just add 120C-5 together, will be fine
Thats Russian’s Engineers fault, they thought about more drag instead of range.
7 Likes
Derby and Darter are the only missiles those countries can get. There is no replacements that would currently lead to any balance in the game.
1 Like
Range depends.
At the same altitude, say 8000m teh AMRAAM is always going to get within NEZ before the R-77
4 Likes