PS-18/A Radar Pod for the B 18A and B 18B - A better AN/APS-4

PS-18/A - Sweden’s Eye on the Baltic Sea

Author of pic: Unknown, retrieved from: Flygradarstation PS-18 PS-18/A by Alf Gustavsson
The text reads: “~Fragile | handle with care”

The PS-18/A is a reconnaissance, search and air to surface radar pod, used primarily on the reconnaissance version of the Saab 18 known as S 18A within the Swedish Air Force. It has seen service on many aircraft types such as the P-82 (F-82), C-47 and even the F4U Corsair, under the designation AN/APS-4.


The PS-18/A is more famously known as the AN/APS-4, as previously stated. The AN/APS-4 was a British radar unit used primarily by the RAF, the Swedish Air Force (SwAF) and the USAF. It became notable for its versatility across a wide variety of aircraft.

Unlike the majority of radars of its era, which operated in the 10 cm S-band, the APS-4 functioned in the X-band with a wavelength of 3 cm. This innovation allowed for a significantly smaller antenna and made it possible to house the system in a streamlined pod, externally mounted in a fiberglass fairing under a wing or fuselage. The pod closely resembled a 500 lb (230 kg) bomb in appearance.

The radar’s operating range made it suitable for multiple roles: large ships could be detected at roughly 15 miles (24 km), aircraft at about 5 miles (8 km), and coastlines at distances of up to 75 miles (121 km). Operators could adjust the display to 4, 20, 50, or 100 nautical miles (6, 30, 80, and 160 km). Peak power output varied between 40 and 70 kW depending on the version, with pulse repetition rates selectable at either 600 or 1000 pulses per second. The system consisted of a control box, one or two displays with amplifiers, a transmitter-receiver, an antenna, and a junction box. The radar beam formed a 6° cone and could be directed in three modes: manual, where the operator controlled elevation; search, which provided a 150° azimuth scan with two vertical sweeps; and intercept, which produced a four-line vertical scan covering 24°. Results were shown on one or two 3-inch (7.62 cm) indicators.

The beam could be directed in three modes, manual, search and intercept.

In U.S. service, the APS-4 was fitted to aircraft such as the Douglas C-47 Skytrain, North American P-82D/F/H Twin Mustang, Vought F4U-2/5N Corsair, Grumman F6F-3/5 Hellcat, Curtiss SB2C-5 Helldiver, Grumman TBF-3 and TBM-3S Avenger, and the Curtiss SC Seahawk.

In the Fleet Air Arm and RAF it was designated ASV Mark IX, where it equipped types like the Fairey Firefly, Fairey Barracuda, de Havilland Mosquito, and a limited number of Grumman Avengers. Two notable variants followed: the AN/APS-5, an improved development, and the APS-6, a simplified version tailored for single-seat fighters. Notably, the APS-6 can be found in game on the F6F-3 (US, FR).


PS-18/A in Swedish Service

The PS-18/A was most commonly mounted on the S 18A, but was also used on the “normal” bomber and torpedo bomber verisons that can be found in game; B 18A, B 18B and T 18B.

In the years following the Second World War, Sweden acquired around 40 surplus AN/APS-4 airborne radar sets from the United States, which were designated PS-18/A in Swedish service.

Operational use in Sweden began at the reconnaissance wing F 11 in Nyköping, where 20 S 18A aircraft were equipped with the radar. The wing’s mission involved maritime surveillance, including the early detection and identification of ships and convoys, as well as determining their position, number, course, and speed. This made it possible to document “normal” traffic patterns in the Baltic Sea, while deviations triggered reconnaissance flights to collect intelligence.

For the first time, the Swedish Air Force was able to conduct these missions with the support of airborne radar, a dramatic improvement over traditional visual observation methods. Before being fitted to aircraft, the PS-18 systems were inspected and modified at CVA (the Central Aircraft Workshop of Arboga).

Initial trials were carried out at the test center in Linköping, and tactical evaluations were conducted by the reconnaissance division at F 3 in Malmslätt. A smaller number of B/T 18B aircraft at F 17 were also equipped with the PS-18, where they were employed as target markers.

Saab_S_18
Saab S 18A with a PS-18/A.

The unit was to be mounted on the armoured bottom of the cockpit section, (where the front bay is located on the T 18B to allow for torpedoes.) The unit itself was fastened with three mounting bolts and consisted out of 6 or 7 main devices: The radar pod, the main unit housing the radar and its electronics, a junction box, where the radar pod would connect with the aircraft’s electronics and other units. The junction box would be connected to the manouvering unit. The junction box would additionally connect to the amplifier which would then connect to the monitor system (radar screen). A second monitor could also be installed. These displays could be set for ranges of 4, 20, 50, and 100 nautical miles (6, 30, 80, and 160 km). The last unit (that would also connect to the junction box) was the radar converter. A radar converter transforms energy or signals, such as power, frequency, or pulse shape, so the transmitter, receiver, and processing units can operate effectively.

image Picture owner is unclear for these two, but can be found in the PDF below.
image

One of the few PS-18/A if not the only PS-18/A left is located at Flygvapenmuseum in Linköping - Sweden, and is the very same unit as seen on the top picture.

Fun facts and general, yet important differences:

-All PS-18/A had to be recalibrated and redesignated from imperial units to metric ones.
-The beacon navigation function was disconnected. And a sea clutter filter, a simple switchable shortened time constant in the video chain, was introduced. Thus, the maritime performance was improved.
-Circa 20 aircraft were outfitted with the PS-18/A.
-The entire unit could be jettisoned in an emergency, for example if you had a risk of the radar getting into enemy hands.


PS-18/A in War Thunder

The PS-18/A would be a relatively easy addition if the War Thunder Team would like an easier approach. This could be done by taking the exact same performance from the AN/APS-4, which is found on the Norwegian Mosquito FB Mk VI ASH of the Swedish tech tree, and adding the sea clutter filter as a pulse doppler function. It’s not the same as a pulse doppler filter, but similar War Thunder-wise.

The radar would find the best usage in naval, simulator and night battles, but could also be an advantage in ARB. Additionally, the AN/APS-4 could be added to more aircraft, including those mentioned earlier, but this post is only for the B 18A and B 18B, which I will get back to later in the text.

The radar pod should be able to be mounted via the load-out menu, as a modification, like seen on the Su-39.
Below is a load-out scheme for the aircraft with the radar compatibility. The white circle symbolizes the radar.

B 18A When equipped, replaces: Nothing
B 18A Rad
B 18B When equipped, replaces: Heavy rockets (front rocket rack)*
B 18B RAD

The PS-18/A and the T 18B

The T 18B was, according to several reports, capable of being equipped with this radar unit, and it was equipped with the radar. However, it’s never specified how it would have been mounted. The reason for this uncertainty is that the T 18, regardless of whether it carried a torpedo or a cannon - had a different lower fuselage section beneath the cockpit compared to the B/S 18 series. This suggests that an alternative, undocumented mounting method might have been used, which makes it fictional to include on the T 18B in War Thunder without proper evidence.

It’s possible the radar could have been mounted on the wing, but there’s no available proof to support this. Therefore, this suggestion only includes the PS-18/A radar for the B 18A and B 18B, both of which have photographic evidence confirming its use.

Radar placement

B 18B rad 2

Pictures

image
These pictures can also be found in the PDF below.
image
B 18B with PS-18/A

Data, specifications
PS-18/A (AN/APS-4)
Type: Airborne air-to-surface search radar
Introduced: 1943
Frequency: S-band main radar (~3.3 GHz); X-band magnetron (~9.3 GHz)
Intermediate frequency: 60 MHz, bandwidth 2.7 MHz
Pulse length: 0.6–1 μs (depending on range setting)
Pulse repetition frequency (PRF): 600–1000 Hz
Peak power: 35–40 kW (-70kW)
Beamwidth: 6°–15° (horizontal and vertical, depending on settings)
Rotation: 60 rpm
Range settings (km): 6, 16, 40, 100, 240
Range resolution: 90 m
Max sweeping coverage (L–>R) 150°
Normal detection range: 24–80 km (for large ships, depending on conditions)
Range (aircraft): Up to 10 km (~5.4 nmi)
Range (coastline): Up to 120 km (~65 nmi)
Antenna / SM unit: Weight ~72 kg; diameter 71 cm (28 in)
Azimuth coverage: 320°
Accuracy: ~5°
Known operators: USA, UK, Sweden (as ASH and PS-18/A)
Sources

AN/APS-4 search radar - Wikipedia
https://www.aef.se/FHT-dokument/Flygburen_spaningsradar_PS-18A.pdf
PS-18/A
Flygradarstation PS-18 PS-18/A
SAAB 18 - HISTORIK
Saab 18 – Wikipedia
SAAB 18 - FV o VERSIONER
https://www.aef.se/Avionik/PDF-filer/PS18_USN_APS-4_Tactical_use.pdf
War Thunder

Would you like to see the PS-18/A in War Thunder?

  • Yes!
  • No.
0 voters

If you have a picture, or find more details for the T 18B’s usage of the PS-18/A, please leave them in the comments. Thank you for reading

3 Likes

+1, I see your fighting tooth and nail to insure the Swedish air suggestions aren’t empty

Hahaha that’s the best thing I’ve read today lol

Jokes aside, yes I kinda am, I wanna make sure that all of Sweden is represented in war thunder, and I also love writing about these things. So it’s a win-win

2 Likes

And it is very much appreciated!

Without your suggestions or other scandinavian suggestions my knowledge about these vehicles would be severely wasted haha.

2 Likes

+1 though the icon that the PS-18/A radar pod would be the same that the Korypo radar uses on the Su-39

Well I won’t complain about more Swedish content, I’ll +1 any that shows up.

Tbh I wish I crank out content as quickly as most of the suggesters do as it took me 3 months to get a crossover passed meanwhile one spaa suggestion is in limbo, another had to be resubmitted after 3-4 months and a patrol boat suggestion is on its 4th resubmission with no response.

very glad to hear that it’s appreciated! :)

yeah I know, the moderators are only 18 ppl. And they have so much to go through everyday - suggestion-wise

and regarding that, thank you. I just thought it would be neat to have different radar icons depending on the age/level of advancement, like we see on missiles and bombs

2 Likes

This will be an unnecessary mod to grind extending the time needed to spade the bombers. The extra weight would degrade the FM even more reducing their effectiveness as a heavy fighter after dropping the payload. Sweden doesn’t have a naval tree either. I can see the appeal in sim but how would it be an advantage in air RB with player markers and night battles?

From a gameplay perspective, it’s pretty much pointless.

You make a fair point about gameplay balance - in Air RB it probably wouldn’t change much in terms of effectiveness. But not every addition needs to be about efficiency or grind advantage. Sometimes it’s just about making the aircraft feel more authentic and true to how it was actually equipped.

The setup in question only weighed a bit over 70 kilograms and was aerodynamic, so it wouldn’t noticeably impact the flight model anyway. The difference would be marginal at best. And while it might not give a huge edge in RB, there’s still some advantage in situations where you (and the opponent for that part too) doesn’t have a fully upgraded crew and can’t see nametags.

Worst case, it could just be a cheap or free modification - and you can always unequip.
Additionally, the navy might be added in the future, it’s not guaranteed, but it might. Then this could be added with the many other sea and maritime armaments/equipment of Sweden.

1 Like

WT is first and foremost a game. If something negatively affects or has no effect on the gameplay, then it’s unnecessary. In this specific case, authenticity needs to take a back seat.

Yes there are pointless mods in the game like shrapnel shells for tanks and EFS on top tier jets, but we’re stuck with them and don’t need more. From your images, the setup doesn’t look aerodynamic and is sure to make the aircraft nose heavy and affect climb rate when equipped. Maybe not on the B18B and T18 but most likely on the B18A with its weaker engines. For people looking to spade them it’s a waste and these aircraft are already effective without it.

Even if some are able to use it the way its intended, it’s only going to be a microscopic fraction of the player base. As for naval, the last thing the mode needs is another tech tree considering how abysmal it is in its current state. There’s no point making devs work on a virtually cosmetic addition that appeals to only a handful of players and extends the modfns grind for the rest

It would be better if it was added as an already unlocked mod rather than something to grind as it is essentially irrelevant for intensive purposes currently, additionally id rather see far more pressing air suggestions be worked on over this as this again lacks any real use compared to something like J29 fuel pods or JATO. Even BOY CM pods would be far more interesting or BK-90 as they would offer a change to gameplay that would actually add something, at least until we get naval and some form of SIM rework this is gonna be something id rather see put at the end of the list to fix.

1 Like

Yes, I agree on the part of it being free or very cheap. And yes, I’d also really like to see those lovely ‘modifications’ in game as well, but one doesn’t exclude another. Additionally, the PS-18/A would be very easy to add, since the AN/APS-4 is already in game. They’d just need to model a shell for it and add a sea clutter filter.