But to say it needs to go up to 7.3, while the IS-3 heads down to 7.0 is having a laugh. Yeah, the mobility is improved, yes the gun is great. But you’re still a KT, you still have that 1-shot delete button that is your turret cheeks. IS-3 may need much longer to reload, but he won’t mind because his hit on you is going to lead to your demise if you don’t take out the IS3 first. As you can see from my winrate in it, the Germans are not having the greatest time when coming up against the USA/Soviets in the 7.0/7.3 area, as it is.
I’ll tell you one thing - you send KT 10.5 to 7.3 and you’ve essentially killed it off, because at that point, you’re better off just running the Maus with the 7.7 line-up.
let me clear, if you insist that you think the T-90A = the very first M1 I will from here on assume you are either trolling or have no idea what you’re talking about to the point I will disregard you as a default. That is how insane your current opinion is. Abort and reevaluate is my suggestion.
At the very least, comprehend that decompression is the way out of these balance issues rather than making the T-90A massively undertiered.
Fox at 8.0 is wild…Thats DF015.Marder territory. Not stabilised, no thermals no commander overide and it’s wheeled with an incredibly loud engine. If you die to the Fox it’s on you.
Conqueror has an 18 second reload with one of the worst performing rounds 120mm APDS sounds great but it’s 1st generation and it shatters or over penetrates a lot of the time.
So if its one shot to one shot capability, whom ever hits first, then that would be fair no? Tiger still has the quicker load. And better round, better mobility.
The only solution if you don’t agree, is:
Decompress everything 6.7 > 12.0, everything gets a 0.3 br increase. But the IS-3 is not any better than the KT105, nor is the IS6 much if any better, other than reload.
Not at all - KT 10.5 has a much higher chance of bouncing off an IS-3/IS-6 than the other way around. Not to mention, IS-3/IS-6 are much survivable to the numerous SPGs lobbing HE shells around that BR. I really don’t think there is a need to move any of these three vehicles, though.
Fake gaijin propaganda point they use so they don’t have to actually decompress, zero basis in reality.
As if that is not what should be strived for the most in a pvp game?
I have made literal entire spreadsheets dedicated to this as just an inspired user. The devs are capable of doing this overnight they just don’t want to.
DF105 is a monster 5 second reload. The 8.0 Marder is stabilised and has thermals and an ATGM.
It’s not incredibly strong it’s good at hiding, the rounds shatter a lot more now on tanks it faces and even lighter vehicles yes it can kill but side shots. It’s strength is being small and the average war thunder players memory span.
The marder is not stabilized. I spaded both of them.
Also, how is it fair for the enemy team, when I’m across the whole map in 15 secs, and can spawn camp? It’s not.
Engine noise doesn’t mean anything when your stationary, and the fox’s cannon is closer in stability to the xm800, than anything like the BTR or marder.
Oh my god. How about I send you a photo of the 88 penning everything it needs to anyway easily while having half the reload? Literally every good player understands why the kt88 is better.
