Proposed ground RB battle rating changes

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
1205

Yeah, I mean the 75mm Jumbo is 5.7, the 76mm Jumbo is 6.3 with 50% more pen.

The KV-1E should be like 0.3 below the KV-1 ZIS-5, which has basically the same armor (slightly worse) and a slightly stronger gun.
The only thing that keeps the KV-1E at 4.0 is it’s premium status.

Tanks are balanced around their performance.
Easy to kill - Can kill easily
is just as balanced as
Hard to kill - Hard to get kills

And 76mm APHE is able to one shot a lot of vehicles by hitting weakspots or simply hitting tanks in the hull side or turret.

1206

@Panzerknacker_31 @UniqueScorpions Going forward take personal arguments to PM’s and avoid going off topic in threads.

1207

Lmao, I’m saving this. The L11 is trash.

Lmao the kv-1 zis is the same br as the Swede one
With the far worse turret.
The Zis should go back to 4.3
1E: 4.0
Zis: 4.3
1942: 4.7
KV-1C: 5.0

It’s logical

1208

How was I arguing? Did you see his comments?

1210

and again, not bad enough to matter here, it should be 4.3

1215

No, this post is a cesspool of bias and the majority dont agree with your takes. Its a fact, this post has been a waste of data and discussion and im all for a mod to lock it since every other post is irrelevant arguing or a biased take. You are biased i am biased. Some points are valid. The better choice would be to argue for an equally less likely need which is decompression.

4 Likes
1216

To the KV-1 L-11???

1217

That’s why decompression is in a poll -_-

A lot of people agree with my decisions, as is if you look through all the posts.

But then the actual biased people show up and throw a temper tantrum

1221

I wouldn’t say its better than the T34, it trades pen and 15 seconds of reload for HE filler

1222

This is true, but they are both very potent. The T30 can over pressure even on no penetrating hits sometimes too

1223

@Forum Moderators

Can this be cleaned up please.

1224

As a few have already been warned 12 hours ago and chose to ignore it, Anything further from this comment resulting in personal disputes will result in the user(s) taking a forum vacation.

But i’ll repeat the other mods comment, If you don’t have anything to say regarding the topic & choose to comment for personal arguments then don’t comment at all, Otherwise see my first comment.

That includes false flagging comments.

3 Likes
1225

Thank you!

1 Like
1226

I’m gonna mention (to my knowledge) the base Strv 122A is the same as a base Leo2A5, so I find it a little odd that you only moved that one.

I’d lile to say something, I know that you don’t have many top tiers on here, but how do you think the list would change if you added a 13.0?

1227

Strv 122 all models (are 2A5’s) they just have armor packages. The 122A has armor like the 2A7V, the 2A5 could go down in BR since the 2A6 and 2A5 both don’t belong at the same BR as the uparmored Leos.

1228

the 122A is slightly better tho, the add on makes it basically the 2A7V armor wise
2A5 go down cuz no armor package

1229

The gun in my opinion is the easiest identifier there, as the Leopard 2A5 operated the L44, as opposed to the newer L55,

Not something I knew tbf

I have always found it really funny that the 2A5, PSO, 2A6, 2A7V, 122A, 122B+, and 122B PLSS are the exact same BR as eachother

1230

Leopard spam

1231

again its soooooo not OP! Not really sure what game you’re playing… every BR has its ups and downs when it comes to OP and Not… but NOW right NOW it is NOT OP! given every other tank.

HOW YOU USE IT makes the difference!

1232

So can a M5A1! Should that be uptiered.!!??