They (T-34-85) can also use the DJW-85 in the game
But I hope they can use this car as an activity vehicle and also use DJW-85 and rocket assisted APFSDS
But I hope they can use this car as an activity vehicle and also use DJW-85 and rocket assisted APFSDS
7 Likes
Please dont be event, either ways China needs some filling up at the 7.0 or 7.3 gap
1 Like
Gaijin can provide China with a T34-85 that emits APFSDS between 7.0-7.3 without a laser rangefinder
Nah, I recon adding the laser range finder one in tech tree, adding a more fun, unique and useful vehicle with a better playstyle.
Laser rangefinder version: 7.3-7.7
No laser rangefinder version：7.0-7.3
(All have APFSDS)
LR version deffos not 7.7, at 7.7 you get ZTS 63 with way more more mobility and a DShK
The protection of T34 will be better than that of 63. It is reasonable for LR version to have the same BR as 63 (poorer maneuverability, no longer afraid .50)(I think the LR version of ZTQ-62 should also be at 7.7BR)
Hold up, what?! apfsds with a rocket booster?
+1 as a separate vehicle with APFSDS.
1 Like
Above 7.0 is too high. The body of the T-34 is so poor that it should not appear above 7.0. There is a choice between laser rangefinders and armor-piercing projectiles, and 6.7 is more appropriate。If you put it in 7.0, he will encounter M60/CLOVIS/T54 1951/TO-55/1208/ZTZ59A/PZH2000HU/STRV103, it’s terrible to think about it.
Youre kidding, armour of T-34 means nothing past 4.0 br.
Both are as easily killable
3 Likes
If Gaijin gives it the best ammo they can dig up plus the range finder it could be fair. Your a T-34 that can snipe but everyone can punch though your armour but you can almost do that to a point. You play like a light tank with non of the benefit of being one. Range is your armour
1 Like
better than 63g(if it use 85APFSDS)
1 Like
No matter how powerful the ammunition is, its artillery performance is no better than that of the 120 project. 120 is only in 8.0, and someone wants it to go to 7.7……This is really speechless. More than 7.0 is 100MM-152MM caliber…If we only look at the performance of artillery, many tanks will be upgraded by more than 1.0.
1 Like
Are you crazy to see the comments of some people who want to put it in 7.3/7.7 or even 8.0? T34-85 (STP) with vertical stability is only at 6.3。Although it has a good gun, it has no stabilizer, and the body is still the T34 of World War II, so if there is no laser version, it is more appropriate to put it in 6.7, not higher, otherwise it will encounter some terrible enemies. If theu laser rangefinder is given, it can be placed around 7.0. The FV4202 It not only has two-way stability, but also has better body and armor, as well as rangefinder, which is only 7.3.
He will have APFSDS
Artillery shells are not the only measure of grade. If we only look at the performance of artillery, the 120 project uses 10.0 artillery and ammunition, and the 292 uses 13.0 artillery and ammunition. M-51 uses 8.0 guns and ammunition, right?
The 120 project is a short pole APFSDS and does not have a laser rangefinder,292 does not have any fire control equipment other than laser rangefinders，M-51 armor piercing bullet is not HEATFS, only HEAT and has poor aftereffect
Let’s take another look at T-34-85 There is a ZTS63 variant with 85 guns in 7.7, which has both APFSDS and laser rangefinder. Basic ZTS-63BR at 6.3(due to HEATFS) So the T3485 with APDSDS and laser rangefinder is completely fine on 7.7 (the reason it is not in 8.0 is that the M41D in 8.0 has thermal imaging)
SO his BR is completely impossible to be lower than ZTS63 Gai. The armor of T3485 is much better than ZTS63, even with the use of Rocket assisted APFSDS
2 Likes
+1