no but clearly it can fire these totally functioning AIM-120’s that totally work (they totally work)
probably right, and is more after the 120 manual than the f-20… Nice one brics spy
AIM-7’s could arguably be BVR, and yet again no proof of it actually being able to fire them and was only planned to mount them, by this logic the Mirage 4000 should be able to mount the triple pylon MICA’s
1- all radar missile are beyond visual range
2- you are posting pictures of a brochure that does nothing to show that the 120 was ever fired from a f-20.
It does not change the fact that it was thought and that it is compatible and that you can fire it if you want I have the F20 book you can buy it whenever you want if it is compatible and it was mounted on the plane it is enough reason for me to receive these missiles within the game sooner or later They are going to put active missiles in the premium ones whether you like it or not.
If you say it, it’s because you don’t like seeing new people in top tier, that’s another topic.
so you’re dying on this hill but you dont want to put in the effort to fact check yourself, gotcha. sooooo sounds like the F-20 cannot fire the AIM-120
I already showed you 2 images, there is a video on the internet that also has the missiles mounted, I showed you 2 different books that do admit that they have it, if you don’t want to admit it, it’s not my job to change what you think. That’s your problem. I trust my research more than believing your word.
do you have the video showing they shot the 120’? if so post the link
You don’t even have arguments to debate me, the conversation with you is over, I’m not going to answer you anymore, so don’t bother writing.
you’re the one arguing over something you have no solid evidence for :sob:
I won’t answer any more questions, I’ve already done my job. I had made the wrong video, here are the amrams
3 : 00 “https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BDgQwlfHII&ab_channel=PuzzlingEvidenceTV”
“An argument without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.”
Zero of your posts contain evidence to support your posts’ arguments, and they’re dismissing your lack of evidence with evidence and without.
Evidence have left the chat
your evidence is mockup AIM-120’s and random places stating its possible it could carry it, my evidence (the flight manual for the F-20) doesnt state anything about the AIM-120 anywhere in it
i took a good look through this and it says nothing
i think the bison is in a very cushy spot as 12.3 and 12.7 mostly fight in 12.0 downtiers against things like f4s, r77 would be a marginal upgrade over r27r in result for br increase that will make you fight top tier almost every match
(unless you expect it to not change br with r73, hmd and r77 which even for a premium is really a stretch)
Sure, you think that the aim120 by that time was public knowledge for an aircraft with intentions of being exported? how innocent you are, you are an innocent child, obviously the F20 was not intended to have Aim120 by that time if not even the fighters in US services had enough stock of Amraam. Even Israel was denied the missiles but that does not indicate that they did not want to add it in addition to sell the fighter fighter you have 1 outdated manual So?
its more credible then what you have? rofl
lol so you link a video that has no mention of the 120… cool