Most trees actually around that area have sooo many vehicles whihc are just never going to be added, Which is sad as hell.
There are many chieftain, vickers, ZTZ (chinese MBTs from the 70s/80s), as well as T series variants, as you stated the T95 series alone they are missing all of the good ones.
You’ve got the missing Type 74s and such.
variants of leopard 1, the A2 A3, A4 etc etc
Even lower tier vics still suffer from absolute clueless teammates, i have this issue with the TURM III and T-55 AM1 TBF
This i agree with, with vehicles like the weasel in game the US should get the TOW humvee, as well as the lav series to combat the BTR.
But hey, guys! It gets extra track armour on top of the existing ERA, so technically it’s better. /s
Cant wait, 60$ track armor is where it’s at. It’s definitely going to br broken with that.
Any news on if it may get better munitions?
The US Army did not use the M60A1 RISE/Passive during the Gulf War. It was used by the Marines (210 tanks) which also used a very few M60A3 tanks, 60 M1A1 HA, and 16 regular M1A1 tanks.
So are really not going to discuss this pack further lol?
60 dollars for this tank is crazy.
Right. They also got the historical operator wrong for the time period.
Sloppy.
so far-
- too expensive and I love M60s and pattons and am a collector-
- incorrect operator for time period.
- incorrect munitions for time period as well,
anything missing?
A laser pointer that the driver can use to occasionally blind other players IRL
Premium Cavalry
Would be funny
If you mean a single line about U.S. Army in the description, we will check it. No other changes, it will have the same ammunition and BR as the regular RISE in the tech-tree.
can i ask as to why?, the M60A1 RISE was fitted with these munitions during Desert storm, why shouldn’t it have access to them?, or even the dozer blade which is iconic of hte M60s the marines used in said war.
there we go, another copy paste premium which has a camoflage from a war but not its munitions or anything that it should realistically have.
Any particular reason why you lot advertised it as:
Yet proceed to not use its historical load out? Oh wait, I forgot, I am talking to the same team that green lit:
-Fictional Kh-38MTs
-Challenger 2 turret basket
-Black hole armour for the BMPTs
-Ahistorical nerfs for the PL-12 (which is supposed to be better than the AIM-120B), PL-12A (on par with AIM-120C-4), the entire AIM-120 family
-Raised the turret on the Abrams so the turret ring is more exposed than it is in real life
-Gave the most heavily armoured NATO MBT (Challenger 2s) no armour (even with proper documents)
-Made the Harriers engines that burn hotter than the Sun
Anything else I’m missing, lads?
Oh wait, you’re the same guy that insulted the people who pay your salary because they wanted AIM 9Ms and AIM 7Ps on an aircraft… that had both. Didn’t you say AIM 9Ms would be unbalanced at 13.0-13.3? Oh yeah, you did. Take a hint, mate, you clearly have ZERO clue on any sort of weaponry. Maybe instead of being combative towards the player base and take our constructive criticism and learn from us. We clearly know more than you at the very thing you’re supposed to be knowledgeable on.