for the love of god stop victmizing yourself like a 13 y/o with hormonal issues its a goddamn game dude
3 Likes
There is no harm. The difference is that the UK already has an 11.3 premium vehicle (the debate about its performance is another story), while, yes, Germany did have other options. However, when it comes down to it, it makes the most sense to put the vehicles from the same family together. It’s not like Canada would be any more “centralized” in WT even if the UK got another ~11.0 premium vehicle. That wouldn’t do much other than bolster the premium line-up.
1 Like
Nope. the British just want domestic IFVs and working Challengers.
It was always the Canadians on the front of the 2A4M CAN to UK fight because we wanted our stuff together.
Leo, ADATS, LAV-III or LAV-6.0(and a TD LAV), CF-188.
So what you think gaijin is purposely trying to go against Canadians? They think of these vehicles as fillers. Not for people who like that country to make a lineup of them.
No way you are Canadian as you might want to claim or put out, this wall of text and complaining you are doing is showing that fact. This quote, also proves that because you just blatantly denied the genocide that happened against the Indigenous peoples of Canada. If you are Canadian, you are a sad excuse of one and am ashamed you are apart of this nation.
You are getting offended on behalf of Canadians when we have absolutely 0 reason to care what tree this gets put in, I am just happy it’s in the damn game.
2 Likes
if the Indian MiG comes to pass it just shows Gaijin doesn’t like the Anglosphere dommions. (after the T-90)
After all the only connection the UK has to either is “commonwealth”. Less then it has with a Canadian Leo.
Compared to Canadian or Australian vehicles which are both close allies and realms with the UK.
And years of abuse of Canada in stories and games have led me to this point. (only exists to be annexed by the US or have the stuff it done ignored) Intun has given me a very negative attitude especially watching people celebrate having the stuff that flies your nation’s flag ripped apart.
One major difference is that the residential schools are considered Canada’s fault and how I was taught.
I never thought to blame the UK for that. however, the India one was solely UKs falt.
Canada became a completely sovereign nation in 1982, and only started severing ties with the UK in 1867 and 1931. In 1982 when our Charter/Bill of Rights/Constitution Act was passed is when every tie with the UK apart from the Monarchy was abolished. The UK still controlled Canada up until 1982. I am not saying Canada is not at fault, especially after 1982. It is just something we have to live with.
Are you kidding me? Abused? Annexed by US? If that’s what you think the US thinks of Canada then you know nothing.
2 Likes
The US even backed Canada up recently when we said we wouldn’t be able to hit the 2% GDP to Military funding goal. (Which is honestly pathetic, but thanks US)
3 Likes
It does Britain doesn’t want Indian vehicles or SA. Especially when the good ones will “Go in the country who made them tree”
By that logic stop adding vehicles and add more trees, Canada and India should both have their own tree.
Canada was an independent nation the 1931. when it became an equal to the UK in the empire. (we had every right and freedom of an independent nation) (and the UK would touch or stop anything we did)
1982 is when the constitution was moved from the UK to Canada. and that date was a propaganda play to hide the damages the government did just a few years earlier.
The UK didn’t think of use as part of them since the early 50s. And internally we where a self-governing country since 1867 and everything that happened inside Canada passed that date is Canada falit.
THATS EXACTLY WHAT I WAS THINKING OF. The us has defended Canada and had good relations with them for a long time.
1 Like
No one makes fun of our crazy war crime hat but us.
2 Likes
You mean checklist?
1 Like
Why not both
1 Like
Incorniclly they are also part of the fault or military is this bad. The other is Government infighting.
It’s a 50/50 on which problem it’s this time. last few major was government infighting.
CF-104, and CF-5 were both caused by the US (or well US companies getting involved. I love my Freedom FIghter but screw you Northrop neither the RCAF nor any part wanted it. and the F-104 was caused ed but the same scandal that did everyone’s) There was a time when Canada wanted nuclear-powered subs to defend the artic and they stopped that.
Chances are, if the CF-100 or CF-101 were to ever be added, they would be added into the British TT, mainly because they are fully Canadian designs like the Skink
They wanted to make more money, Germany have zero use for it everyone will just buy the 2PL its the same tank and cheaper than 70 dollars.
Germany could have had a Swiss 2A6 premium a country they have a close military and cultural ties with. Then to go with the Hunter they could have an F-5 and eventually an FA-18.
Meant CF-105