you claimed that there are differences so please show your sources for it
The missile parameters I referenced come from the community-maintained Guided Weaponry Data spreadsheet.
that is not a source
i want a source for your claims about the 54C+ performance and not the datamines
Calm down, bro; it’s a game. The spreadsheet was the source for the missile parameters. The proposed AIM-54C+ values were my own suggestion and not presented as historical figures.
so you were making baselss claims with no real sources to back them up by using AI
and now that i ask for a proper source you come with this
1 Like
the most based take on this post
You’re treating a balance proposal as if it were a historical claim.The data came from the spreadsheet.
The proposed AIM-54C+ values were my suggestion.Those are two different things.
yours ?
i doubt that
The interesting thing is that we’ve spent more time discussing ChatGPT than discussing AIM-54s.
I conceded the ΔV point. Do you have any comments on guidance, ECCM, tracking, or are we still talking about AI?
yall are genuinely arguing over nothing when we all want the same gernal thing
1 Like
They even dont add eccm feature
2 Likes
Gaijin be like:
-implement a hyped vehicle in its lamest copy and paste form
-watch the Playerbase explode below its devblog
-give in to the easiest of demands of the Playerbase
-ignore the rest and let the mods tank what comes next
Do they really think that this will calm everything down ?
They do not even give us any reasoning for this decission.
Communication was truly achieved , but at what cost🦉
13 Likes
It gains performance because it picks better flight path generally because it have improved computers and does better calculations , picks better angles and results in keeping energy/speed better.
It’s like Red Bull F1 , when the one car is Verstappen and the other was Perez…
Verstappen with the same car had better speeds/times.
2 Likes
Tf did cobra even do, cuz you really gotta screw up bad to get chat banned here
What did I miss
2 Likes
If you check his profile it says the exact reason of the ban.
I see, well glad to see it because he was getting seriously annoying. Hopefully will be calmed down when he’s back.
Anyway, pretty ridiculous that they added the new C+ only to make it identical to the former missile. But I guess it’s also a way of not giving enough reason to add F-14D to the tech tree
1 Like
Me when I lie.
1 Like
Those are for the event and for the nuke-carrying bombers only as a matter of game balancing. The ECM is not implemented in the standard air battles matches, so such mechanics are not present. He is right.
2 Likes
Its not in game as playable asset so that argument is irrelevant.
I would be happy if we could just push this: Community Bug Reporting System
It would be pretty big.
6 Likes