I wonder how much feedback is needed to change the developers mind on this
1 Like
There is other A2A 25s but they already gave the best MiG-25 it should’ve been the 25PD in the TT and the MiG 25P shoulda been the event one
THEY ALREADY ARE LEAVING PHOENIXS(54C+) OFF THE F14D
MiG 31 carried like 8 different missiles
First gen R33 wouldn’t have more range or G overload than phoenixes either
Why is gajin so keen on forcing the F-14D (the supposed to be upgrade over the F-14B) to stay at 13.0 at the same exact BR of the older model? It is infact an U P G R A D E, and i do not understand why the company seems to be trying to hold it down? I would argue that damn near everyone would have expected the F-14D to be at a higher br, bc guess what. It should have BETTER armament, since thats half as to what the F-14D was upgraded on.
To add onto this, people are already upset about it being premium, but even the people like me where i’m not crazy upset about the premium aspect. I’m crazy upset about the fact that its not even worth what it costs, because its not what is advertised
(Its advertised as an F-14D, but lacks about 65% of what made it an F-14D)
5 Likes
The only thing i can ask is if the f14D will get the aim54C+/Sealed and the aim7P?
2 Likes
MiG-25P/PDS/PDSL/PDZ ?
no flares with those massive engines vs R-27ET is crazy
also at same br as f14 with 6x ARH vs 4x SARH
Mig-25P is just worse and PDS/PDSL dont really bring anything relevant for WT to the table
you may see a worse MiG-25 but i see R-40T at lower BR to face more flareless planes
and thats the exact reason becasue it wont be added
because it wont have CMs and thus would be at a lower BR than the 25PD
1 Like
Say that to the new tanks we got.
Actually they can integrate the aim120A because it’s compatible and it’s been proven Countless times that what I mean. dude on the bottom of “not yet integrated” they’re literally talking about a f-14 test firing aim120 on a f14 against targets.that dosent just mean armaments but also the radar, store management subsystem and other stuff. I’m pretty sure fighter to fighter net also works with fighter to missiles updates
2 Likes
Imagine a R27et at mach 2.4
My 3.0 kd with the mig25pd dont says the same btw
so what does your KD say about the mig25p or the mig25pds
because both of them are not in the game
1 Like
No the Mig25pd that one is peak i do one with 5 kills rn
That’s the joke. A bunch of Newbies will do it like they do with every other premium fighter jet.
and the one i wasnt talking about in the message you replied to
Implement all-aspect PD seeker for AIM-54C/C+ (issue already passed Community Bug Reporting System) at least. This change would make F14B competitive at 13.0 , and F14D a good 13.3 candidate.
8 Likes