Slop and cope.
1 Like
“Slop” is when you have to pull out your wallet for half the unique tanks ingame, not when one of the less unique TT tanks gets reskinned (you can take the ridiculous skin off, too) with economic benefits.
Your slop disgusts me.
1 Like
no we need more hyper unique and cool one off prototypes as premiums
thats way better trust
All you needed to mention was “Maverick,” cause Top Gun is the real seller here.
1 Like
Better yet, let’s make highly-produced service vehicles premiums and/or inaccessible to TT! Like the A-1H, 2/3 EBRs, and F-4S! Non-copy-paste premiums are so healthy and good for the longevity of the game!
2 Likes
they can add the early batches F-4S (F-4S without agile eagle) in the TT
Hell no, all the unique vehicles should be event vehicles not premiums
My name is after the VT1-2 and I’m ok with it not having premium
i was being sarcastic
Spoiler
Ich weiß dass es nicht so offensichtlich scheint, vorallem wenn Englisch nicht deine Muttersprache ist
2 Likes
And yet, they haven’t, just like they haven’t added an A-1H alternative or the last Des Moines-class sister to TT :/
They’re just incredibly greedy, as if premium time + premium vehicles + packs + battlepass + events aren’t already enough monetization methods… Meanwhile games like Warframe survive off of just paid cosmetics and speed-ups for the grind.
1 Like
I figured so but a dev is gonna read that and go “wow now that’s a really great idea”
No, you don’t understand where to spend your money. Those who don’t spend one dollar on the game understand better that you need to buy a TT clone. Did you hear me?
i dont need to give them idea they already have
1 Like
nobody asked you cobra
5 Likes
5 Likes
Summary of what I don’t like and should be changed/added:
AIM-7P
AIM-9M(Confirmed to be added, but still doesn’t make the F-14D unique since the B is also having it)
AIM-54C+
Tech Tree Variant either just as a variant that has the same things or AIM-120A, even though BVVD said they don’t want no F-14A-65-GR, Womp womp players would be happier if it was added.
Also pretty much every US Air tech tree vehicle should have AIM-9Ms excluding F-15A and F-16A, the A-7E should also have AIM-9Ms too. I really don’t get the pick and choose idea that Gaijin seems to have when it wants to buff something and or nerf something for “Balance” because that makes sense ig. It’s not really balancing it’s just the same reason as “because I can” or “I feel like it” but even if they were to say that I think it’d be more honest atleast even if people don’t like the response, and if you think people wouldn’t like the response then don’t do it, and prodominantly look at the overall majority of what people are saying.
6 Likes
let me clarify, every rank 8+ air vehicle should have AIM-9Ms
4 Likes
Hello. But what about Aim-54C+ ???
7 Likes
This is not nescesarily the devs fault.
The Devs just develop whatever they have to develop.
This might be the work of either the marketing team or someone elses work.
I do not think that they deserve that much criticism.
Community management and outsourcing are the problem here I think.
4 Likes
Please tell us that someone is working on a proper statement.
Players are clearly upset about many things judging by the activity on the forum and the amout of negative Steam reviews. Content creators started addressing many of the issues the game is facing rn.
This situation must also be stressfull for the entirety of the community management Team so a statement wich fully adresses most of these issues would be appropriate.
So confirmation on you guys working on a statement and truly listening to feedback would really help calming things down.
Unless there is no big statement coming. In that case: …oh, yikes
10 Likes
15 Likes