No bro, i can prove that earth is not flat.
What are you not happy with? Phoenixes are now stronger than aim120
You want 7p? But why? If there are phoenixes, you will never use a sparrow.
Just because it has phoenixes doesn’t mean It should only use phoenixes plus they both serve different purposes one is a long range missiles while the other is a medium range missile
Also aim54 being as strong as aim120 is debatable even with the recent buffs
8 Likes
btw phoenixes are currently stronger than both Sparrow and Aim120a. They’re too strong. I hope they get nerfed after the patch, they’re too strong a rocket for 13.0. It is unbalance too much
They serve different roles. The AIM-54 is much more niche than the Sparrow or AIM-120. The Sparrow and AMRAAM are more general-purpose air-to-air missiles, sparrows being worse is debatable, AIM120a are just better. Also, the AIM-54 is not a rocket; it is a missile.
2 Likes
Yeah that’s all in your head
lol dude you must be a f-14 hater
2 Likes
we talking about game not about irl dude.
aim54 missle on dev right now is better than aim120a
I am talking about in game too, and the dev closed and it’s not better than the AIM120a.
3 Likes
Show us documents showing the opposite then.
1 Like
Gajin doesn’t need such documents. After the patch is released, they’ll see that the Russian community will be very unhappy with the unrealistic missle flight data and will fix it.
yes correct, I misspoke. You can prove a negative. In this case though with the KH-38MT, the burden of proof is on Gaijin to prove it in fact exists, by listing a legitimate source. Back to topic. We can only assert it doesn’t exist because of a lack of a source.Anyway back to the topic: They finally are fixing the AIM-54 because they realized their pre-orders for the F-14D weren’t materializing.
I don’t see why the Russian community would be mad particularly as their is other nations in the game, also a 20+ g missiles doing a 180 at low speed is far from unrealistic.
Using (r = v^2 / ng), a 17G missile can make a 6 km radius turn at roughly 1000 m/s, and a 25G missile can do it at roughly 1210 m/s. So if the AIM-54 is slower, the 6 km radius can be physically possible. The issue is the speed during the test: if it is doing that radius near 4800 km/h, then it would need around 30G, which would be questionable.
1 Like
You most certainly can prove a negative mate what?
it’s called disproving something.
the point of the matter is, why do some vehicles get weapons they didn’t or even couldn’t use while others dont.
They don’t have to prove anything to you. It’s their game and their project. They can add whatever they want to the game if they want.
Because it will be pure hell on 13.0, where there will be an 80% win rate for Super Tomcat. It’s the same story as with the BMPT, which now (dev) has a spread like an 18th-century cannon. Well, 90% of the players are Russian here.
read my reply after, I agree you can prove a negative. I meant to say the burden of proof is on Gaijin to prove the MT exists. We can say it doesn’t, because we can’t find a source, but that does necessarily prove it doesn’t exist, because we don’t have infinite knowledge.
To answer your question: it boils down to Gaijins selective realism/hypocrisy.
It’s not going to be hell for the 13.3 SUs that is for sure.
3 Likes
How they gonna use “fake” documents if they won’t even use real documents that people use
Rage bait use to be believable
2 Likes
Aim54 does not have such turn rate. It is unreal to be better than aim120 so much in turn
The Phoenix needs a buff too, look, lower winrate c: