Nah, they’re just going to copy and paste the base AIM-54C into the best IOG and that’s that
I don’t care. Just not higher than the premium Su-30’s, which everything down to 12.0 already face. Again again, I have the premium RU Su-30 and absolutely stomp every F-14 I encounter, including the IRIAF Tomcat (which I also have.)
Accurate loudout > BR rating. Give ALL the Tomcats their appropriate munitions. Battle rating is secondary.
8 Likes
Nice for you
Yes , fuck how play 12.0
1 Like
He is good haha.
Lmao same, people wouldn’t react so mad to the F-14D if it weren’t for those two Su-30s.
4 Likes
You asked a question, I gave a reply. I say that I have the premium Su-30 to SUPPORT the F-14’s getting their appropriate loudouts. I’m not bragging or flexing, I’m giving my experiences which support giving the F-14’s everything that they could carry.
Yup, that’s why I keep posting friend. I play “both sides” of this debate, and I will absolutely state the truth that the premium Su-30’s stomp all the F-14’s as they are currently implemented. (And the other 13.0-13.3 RU planes make easy work of the F-14’s, which I also have.)
4 Likes
That can also dogfight if needed to
Yeah that too late for the game and if a aircraft did everything that other aircraft did it would be a amazing just look at f/a-18 for example
I pre ordered the F14D just to play the SU-30 and kill the F-14 enjoyers. Cooked.
3 Likes
Yes, but it wasn’t designed for that
Actually it was
1 Like
No, it was a secondary consideration so much so that the F-111 was originally intended for the role, but they actually ended up creating a fighter capable of dogfighting, whereas the F-14 was designed to be a missile carrier
It was designed a bit for everything, not primarily for dogfights but it was part of the requirement. it’s a fleet defense interceptor only, the wings were designed to do this job perfectly to go fast and high but also expend to land and take off from aircraft careers but was also considered for dogfighting.
It’s in there https://www.gao.gov/assets/092339.pdf.
The Navy seemed to really love it by the way haha.
Also the Phoenix was designed for interception purposes ( either be it cruise missiles or planes). Basically Fleet Interceptor first, then missile bus and dogfighter )
5 Likes
Exactly and witch is why I can say it was also designed for dogfights because it was part of requirements
2 Likes
Im pretty sure a few of those were dogfights or at least in close quarters combat
Sikret new ultra pack 120euros and it included amraams
1 Like
The f14 is the fighter they designed to replace the f111b that is capable of dogfighting like the multiple dogfight engagements it did in top gun/training against fa/-18,f15,f16 and hell probably even 4477th Test and Evaluation Squadron the Red Eagles who flew mig17,mig21,mig23
2 Likes
You lot really are taking things too literally. Objectively speaking, it is capable of engaging in dogfights and has probably done so on a few occasions, but the point is that its primary purpose was and remains to serve as a system capable of intercepting missiles and aircraft heading for an aircraft carrier using AIM-54s.
R60s are ass, as well as that you could just MP towards it avoid all the R27s then smash them. so no.
It was its primary mission but not all f14 had to do it they can also do other missions as well like tarps pod or Lantirns pod or even before the budget cuts happened it was supposed to be capable of carrying almost everything the navy armaments inventory had.
The plane came out at 1974… there was literally no contest from a soviet plane in a dogfight/gunfight to F-14 for 10 years.
What wasn’t designed for dogfighting?
Yes , F-15 was better at high alt, Tomcat was better at low alt . Even against a 16 ,a 14 was better at mid/high alt (over 10km) …ok at lows 16 would destroy it. Talking a 16A block 5 or 10 .
But , overall it was designed to dogfight , with its advantages and disadvantages.
RL wasn’t like in game.
If we had historical/timeline MM you’d laugh really!
3 Likes