With all due respect this has nothing to do with the current topic of this thread, please direct it elsewhere, thank you
I genuinely hope nobody buys these so they drop in price
Hell I’d take a missile cruiser over a bb for Russia :)
Especially since the Scharnhorst magically won’t die despite being hit in the ammo many many times.
Tell you what. I’ll take the time to run the data you say you want, whatever it shows. But if it shows a relative decline in Naval AB 2 months ago compared to all other modes, which is what you seem to want to see disproven here, you’ll agree to never troll on in every single off-topic naval thread about how Naval AB is better now ever again. Deal?
I don’t know how it’ll turn out, but on those terms, given all the complaints you’re getting, I’d consider it a community service. :)
never said that, it will show same decline in NAB and NRB, now bring it on, and then try too say it’s new aiming hurt playerbase nonsense and not the absents of events(when people switched to farm ground and air marathons), bugfixes, real new content(not just another vehicles) and gameplay changes which was for years now, what is really declined the playerbase .
I would have jumped at one or both of these premium botes before the changes to Naval Arcade aiming. But now? I will not even consider them when they go 50% off during sales. I will keep repeating myself until changes/fixes/or a full reversion of the aiming changes happen. I LOVED Naval before, now I cannot stand it.
Please Devs/Managers/Mods have a conversation with us Naval players who are unhappy with the Naval Arcade changes, thank you: [Poll] with multiple options for the changes to Naval Battles
The screenshots below are to show my willingness to spend my $'s when the game/mode is enjoyable. But the current state of Naval Arcade has been absolutely ruined for me. My favorite premium bote lineups:

Sorry about feeding your troll. I’ll keep any response from now on in my own thread.
EDIT: Aaaaand shadowbanned. I wonder by who?
Hey I have no problem with taking this to the mods if he tries again. It’s about time they noticed Kweedko’s actions. As promised, I’ve put the stats in a better thread for them.
But anyway, here’s my on-topic take on OP. I think there’s a serious chance that the June Ship-a-ganza, including these store premiums, is going to bring people back to naval who have been ignoring it. And it’s very possible they don’t like what they see as far as the AB changes, and the ongoing inversion in popularity between naval AB and RB will be accelerated. But we’ll see.
So what, someone liked new one why devs should prefer your position over their?
So you retreat when saying you will bring data asked here?
It’s fine im just trying to keep it on topic, tbh i am planning on buying these myself, the german one at least, i have an event ship i want to play but i refuse to play anything without a lineup
Can I suggest that you advocate for settings to toggle between methods of aiming in arcade rather than for a straight reversion of the changes?
You are more likely to get somewhere with that suggestion
I actually did, and opened a bug report, but the bug reporting managers completely ignored my post, closed my report, and responded incorrectly/with a statement that doesn’t even address my report. I’ve tried. Been ignored the entire time, I have simply been playing other games now and spending my money elsewhere. Until we are no longer ignored, posting a couple/few times a month on the forums is the most I can muster.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/4OHnVjZwifFf
Because it’s not bug. Make a suggestion in suggestion section.
Becuase that is something that will belong in
and not a bug report
I have tried, they close them/delete them/will not allow them. All I have gotten is the cold shoulder, not a word from a dev/manager/or mod. Period. Just complete radio silence.
There are multiple other players who get the same treatment when trying to open new suggestion threads. Delete delete delete. No reason, no (real) explanation, refusal to have a conversation.
Have you tried DMing a Suggestion mod:
https://forum.warthunder.com/u?group=Suggestion%20Mod.&order=topic_count
and asking what the issue is with the suggestion?
I can think of no issue with the suggestion itself other than perhaps there already being one and so Instead Id guess there may be an issue with how it was written
Meh, I don’t care enough anymore. Either the devs don’t care, or the managers/mods are not communicating the conversations happening on the forums. Either way, I have spent enough of my time trying, I will just continue to play other games until they feel like reaching out to me/us. The ball is in their court, they just simply wont get any further play time or money from me until they choose to at the minimum have a meaningful conversation about Naval battles, specifically Arcade.
I greatly appreciate the time and effort many of you guys are putting in to improve the situation, and I try to like and comment on the positive/constructive posts and/or suggestions. I am just too frustrated at this point to push the issue myself anymore.
$80, for whats just going to be another 7.0 in a mode Gaijin keeps absolutely destroying with unpopular changes that were never voted on
While I think the ships are cool, it just is not worth it to purchase either seeing as how bad Naval’s compression is rn and the current state of Naval Arcade
I’ll actually be surprised if anyone purchases these
Hell, whats worse is that you’d probably have a more enjoyable time just purchasing the Nassau or Zeleznyakov, of course, unless you play arcade
Whats funny is Im actually worried about how much these will be spammed in top tier and be a menace to deal with
Thats fair
Personally, I talk a lot on naval but I only have Japan up to 4.7 rn, so I cant really speak on top tier personally
When US PBR?