Post about how light tanks with spikes work in Warthunder

[Nowel]

@CollectorOfSins

Locking on is fine, most of the issues with spikes are that is’s missing its top down attack.

I do agree that we need a higher impact angle, but the locking does need a review, they quite often targets the engine and exhausts

@SadRIPer

They’ll never buff spike missiles

They had buffed them in the past, there is no evidence that they will not buffed them anymore.

[Brake_pc]

As i said in the post they need to lock more ez on targets in maps with 2 much bushes they start to lose soo ez when launched our they even dont launch to the target

[Hartsy1]

mine normally give up and just kiss dirt lol

[Sandwich1776]

Insanely real

[Killpo1]

i mean they’ve already publicly expressed that at the very least the TOW-2B is artificially nerfed for gameplay reasons. It would reason to believe they take that approach with all top attack, to not have it be a consistent I win button.

[Brake_pc]

If this is real why Russian based atgms are better in any kind of aspects comp to nato based ones

[Got_a_choppa]

@Brake_pc

namer RCWS-30 is a 11.3 ifv for the Israel tech tree and its the best ifv in the game for now

@Brake_pc

namer has a powerful 30mm bushmaster mk44 cannon that cam kill anything in his br bracket and it is almost better armored than the bmpt

[Brake_pc]

Never used the namer in his life and prob is premium our even better a russian that loves to use under br t80

[TenPoundsOfSalt]

@Nowel

I do agree that we need a higher impact angle, but the locking does need a review, they quite often targets the engine and exhausts

Currently they target a module, the issue is that they can target any module. Sometimes it’ll be the autoloader or the fella sitting in front of the ammo, sometimes it’ll be the roof MG or the radiator.
For obvious reasons F&F ATGMs should never be guaranteed OHK in current WT, but I would like to see Gaijin restrict the targeting to crewmembers, control modules, and gun component to raise the probability to get at minimum a crippling hit. And then if needed, raise them higher.

[Pheonix_RX01]

If you’re gonna talk about the 10.7 spike carriers you might as well talk about all of them

[Brake_pc]

Talking about the ones ho actually work and not the puma vjtf that is a crtl c crtl v froom the puma but with spikes

[markimash]

@Brake_pc

Add more Spike-LR to it atleast 10 max

@Brake_pc

Add 8 Spike-LR max
+And add atleast 10mm+ more armor for his turret ammo pack

@Brake_pc

Add more 15mm+ of armor in his front

@Brake_pc

+Change his pen to 1000mm in 0° change his pen in 30° to 800mm and decrease his pen in 60° to 400mm
+Add more speed to it atleast 20 to 30 m/s

Just make sure the stuff you submit for these changes are not export restricted or anything.

[Brake_pc]

What u mean?

[Hartsy1]

He’s gotta be trolling surely?

[markimash]

They dont accept export restricted documents for bug reports

[Brake_pc]

Its about balance and not restricted documents

[markimash]

Without documents, how are you going to prove that the armor is 15mn thicker than in-game?

[Brake_pc]

As i said balance and not about documents because if we go for the documents and irl parameters half of russian tech tree will be turn to ashes

[Brake_pc]

Also if we go for documents the spike missile how be a lot better than it is in Warthunder

[markimash]

I dont support further pushing war thunder into WoT.