Possible M1A2 Blueprint/Reverse engineering diagram

EDIT found the source

ТЕХНИКА И ВООРУЖЕНИЕ ВЧЕРА, СЕГОДНЯ. ЗАВТРА

Научно-популярный журнал

Июль 1998 г.

Михаил Растопшин

EQUIPMENT AND WEAPONS YESTERDAY, TODAY. TOMORROW

Popular science magazine

July 1998

Mikhail Rastopshin

Second source

If this is true, than the M1 is WAY more armored than in game. Like insanely armored.

x6DM0PT

Translation from google
Fig. 1) of domestic tanks is slightly lower than that of the M1A2 (Table 2). The remaining thicknesses of the turret and hull armor (roof, bottom, side) of foreign and domestic tanks are almost the same. The armor diagram of the M1A2 tank is shown in Fig. 2, which indicates the use of thin armor plates to protect the roof of the turret and hull, as well as the bottom and sides. The exceptions are zones “B” and “K”, located in the sector zone ±30 ° and having an anti-projectile resistance of about 700 mm and an anti-cumulative resistance of 850 mm. Anti-projectile resistance of any fragment of protection equal to 700 mm means that if an armor-piercing sub-caliber projectile has an armor penetration of 700 mm, then this fragment is not penetrated by this projectile. A comparison of the armor-piercing capabilities of foreign BPS (600…700 mm) and domestic (420…500 mm) with the armor resistance of the frontal protection of tanks shows, on the one hand, that the protection of our tanks will be penetrated by their shells (for example, M-829), and on the other hand, the protection of foreign armored vehicles will not be penetrated by domestic armor-piercing sub-caliber shells.

5 Likes

I support all schizo ramblings, +1 for wherever this is going!

4 Likes

This is years old, even shown in some old-forum wt forums

9 Likes

Was it debunked?

That I do not know, but one thing I can say for sure is that I wouldn’t trust that diagram

1 Like

Would be better than having no reference at all

Gaijin has seen this before and already said they will not take Russian sources for the Abrams cause they can’t trust it.

but they’ll take indian sources to nerf nato 120mm HEAT-FS

6 Likes

🤷 They will choose what they want.

6 Likes

That makes no sense, I’d trust Russian sources more than what the department of defense would put out. DOD would definitely under value all the numbers as to not give other nations an idea of the capabilities. Russian sources would have no merit over-inflating the values

What’s funny is, the side skirts and inner hull measurements line up with the diagram I posted



{272208A7-A129-4371-9704-B36DA0572552}

Maybe someone made this using the warthunder models 🫠

2 Likes

XDDD

“This a damn sentence”

2 Likes

The stretch your trying to prove is, insane.

I’m not trying to prove anything, I said “If this is true”

It probably is partially, in the sense of everything that is unclassified is available.

Also, I lowkey think you’re misreading it a little bit.

Maybe, maybe not. Just using what dimensions are already there, kinda like how I reverse engineer irl but not a whole lot to go on. I’d love to see what the internal dimensions are. I could probably machine a small scale model lol

image

I believe Turret cheek armor thickness is red line to red line in the diagram.

Where “B” is is the frontal vortices of the port turret cheek.

Also, 4500 is your total turret length, this being in MM, so, 4.5 meters overall length.

You can use the front to the center of the turret ring of 3.55 meters to then subtract roughly 1.77/1.88 meters to get total turret ring radius, times 2 is your overall diameter.

Ring is 2150mm if you check the hull diagram, that looks correct

Actually you’re right about the 4500, I thought that was 4600, make sense why the lines were a tiny bit off

1 Like

2150 is also simply the interior ring space, my calc on the (3.55-1.8) • 2 is the exterior diameter, then you can finally find your total ring depth.

That’s a very rough estimate however.