Sure Russia has the best SPAA and CAS jets, but their tanks do not compare to the likes of Leopards. Any competent player will prefer the more powerful tanks over the CAS jets. CAS doesn’t win games if your team is garbage. Tanks can. Russia just has the easiest lineup to use - not the best.
1 Like
i mean the statistics tell me that Russia has the 3rd highest winrate with the biggest playrate by far so yes best SPAA and CAS do actually win games
Russia is tied with a lot of nations - its more of a problem of any nation being paired with garbage US players losing.
4 Likes
Is it confirmed that other tanks can use the vacuum round except the T-14 tho?
The penetrator is very long(so autoloader may need modification) and apparently it needs the 2A82 gun which Russia doesn’t seem to want to equip even on the T-90M and only built enough for the T-14s they have.
yeah russia is tied DESPITE having something between 5-7 times the playercount of other nations. Thats the problem, if russia was balanced the sheer amount of idiots should have the same effect as it has with the US
1 Like
Here’s the thing though - Most Russian top tier players aren’t idiots. Their tanks IRL have horrid reputations so you have kids flocking to the Abrams or Leo 2. On top of this their tanks are skillcheck vehicles. Most Abrams players shoot a T-90M centermass and call out Russian bias. They’re good tanks to counter idiots with, which is 99% of US top tier players.
Also, Russia and Germany are often paired together, leading to a matchup with the best CAS, Tanks, and SPAA, so there’s that.
3 Likes
Ah yes sorry comrade Russian brain is just superior to stupid american brain and only the bestest of the best even touch the soviet tree. Or maybe russian top tier is a lot easier to play and the tanks are better than what most russia players here claim
1 Like
doesnt fit either in the autoloader lmao, maybe inform yourself first
In essence, yes, US players are a lot more dumb than Russian ones. If you actually read my post I mentioned how Germany and the US are paired against the US, meaning the glue-eating Abrams players are just hopeless. And since minor nations dont comprise a majority of the team, Britain/Israel + whatever else is paired with them for that match have to suffer.
3 Likes
The fact that youre actually believing this is perfect prove that russia players are just as dumb as US players
1 Like
LMAO yes… Russia suffers so heavily, that’s why they have a near 60% average winrrate when they get to play exclusively with China against everyone else in GSB… Cry me a river
Definitely not. The T-series tanks are just more retard-proof
1 Like
I do actually find the 46 is more than enough, easily go through the entire Leopard 2 hull lol of course extra pen from the 60 are welcomed as it allows us to go through most angles
1 Like
This is probably the most one-sided match up ever
3 Likes
Said the person who’s only played 1 nation at GRB top tier…
1 Like
This is true. Abrams is harder to play and will grant far better results if you know how to play it.
not needed and 3BM59 would make no practical difference
The only nation that has this big of a population difference is america in air, evident by the fact they are on both team in ARB at higher tiers literally every match. This is not the case for USSR in ground, and only sometimes in ARB matches.
Ya they are better for holding W gameplay, which is something you want to move away from when you learn to actually play the game, and then all the problems with russian tanks come out and its frustrating to play them in that manner vs other nations tanks, assuming chinese and british tanks are the same to some degree as well.
https://youtu.be/db8AApc_udM?t=230
This guy has some of the best in depth map guides for ground, and every time you will see you have issues with playing tanks with poor depression in these spots, and you have to play the game completely differently and usually not as ideal or strong as the spots you can with nato tanks.
2 Likes
Cool.
What wins games though?