???
that sounds like something that would put MiG-29 as a competitive fighter on that BR, I’d be happy if they do that
Obviously would move up to 13.0, with the current stat of BR compression adding the r73, removing r27er and call it a day wouldn’t be a good solution. You have the F-16A block15 with aim9m at 13.0 for a reason and that jet doesn’t even have a sparrow
1 Like
yeah, I just feedback on that and you are right, I can’t see a MiG-21 bis fighting a MiG-29, maybe 12.3 would be better by avoiding the top dogs of 13.7
I did. Never noticed any differences in G pull.
Not just Bis, any 11.0 would struggle.
12.3 without R-27ERs, and just R-27Rs would make for an interesting experience IMO.
That’s just a BR compression issue, and it won’t be solved unless Gaijin puts effort into improving WT.
There is zero need to downtier it. Just do as I said earlier.
I hope you’re trolling
yeah, then F-16s should be moved since the first F-16 has only fox-2s and the second F-16 is similar to the current status of MiG-29 (9-13)
It is too hard to think where to place every plane so that they can accommodate themselves acceptably. since the max BR is 14.0, maybe if they could pull the BR to 15.0, all planes could be placed better. but IDK what is GAIJIN doing
1 Like
Moved where?
F-16A (13.0) would be too good at 12.7 with 6x AIM-9M
Why?
It very much still would, R-73+HMD is an incredible combination that 11.7 shouldn’t face. The MiG-29G of course can’t work magic like the Su-27 but it still is incredibly dangerous in a dogfight. Just remove R-27E and add R-73 and make 13.0, with most 13.0s going up to 13.3 (where they absolutely can handle themselves just stay low and don’t tunnel vision) This works even better with decompression to 14.7 or 15.0.
1 Like
Yes. The French F-16A is the perfect example of the sad state of BR compression around 12.7-13.0
It would be too good for 12.7, but it’s a bad 13.0
F-16A ADF should be 4/6xAIM-9M & 2AIM-7F making it equal to MiG-29 (9-13) with 4xR-73 & 2xR-27R/T
6x R73 is more powerful than including R27R/T and this vehicle would already be on the edge of balance with the 4x r73/2x r27
Then you go on to say this after you make me explain the former? What was the point?
21bison at 12.3:
But then it’s worse than the Mig-29G which has both the R-27Es and R-73s. I do agree that it would probably be too good for 12.7 with R-73s and R-27Rs.
“R-73+HMD is an incredible combination that 11.7 shouldn’t face.”
Also F-4J has HMS at 12.0
With the current state of 13.0, that would put the ADF on a worse position often. It also would just be a worse F-15A
12.3 minimum. The R-60Ms aren’t the greatest, but at 12.3 the R-27ERs are still good but not facing MiG-21s, F-5Es, Tornado IDSs, etc. It’s like the MiG-23, you rely on two missiles, but yet a skilled player will make use of all they have on hand. Also, the 9-12 has the same issue, which I assume you were including in this post
Alternatively, raise the MiG-29A to 13.0 and give us another BR bracket (15.0)