btw. no mater of your woes about that “nobody gonna play with new aiming, everyone hate it” StatShark - See All Player, Missile, and Vehicle Statistics shows increase in games played on all boats and ships April vs March despite of all of the bugs and that fact that April not even ended yet.
Monthly stats probably not full for april-march, cause i played JDS Ayanami recently ant there is no info on this and NRB stats diff is the same, gonna check when april ends.
lol. My dude. The proof is in the game. Play a match. Try to shoot a player. You’re not. The AI is. Try to shoot a boat over a strip of land and watch the gunners target the water. A well known phenomenon. …you’re not doing anything but refuting facts as if they weren’t facts. Which, I can tell you, I’m very familiar with these day. People making up “facts”.
NO ONE here is going to accept that they have MORE autonomy in the game NOW then they did before.
lol. Not anyone who knows what the word “autonomy” or “agency” means.
An ad hominem fallacy, or ad hominem attack, is a type of logical fallacy where someone attacks the person making an argument rather than the argument itself. It’s essentially a personal attack, and it’s considered a fallacy because it doesn’t address the actual issue or evidence.
Look, there is a large segment of the community Voting, Discussing, Insisting, Explaining, Pleading. These are veterans with THOUSANDS of hours of game play and, in my case, hundreds of dollars supporting Gaijin because of this gamemode.
And they’ve destroyed it.
And they’ve left it destroyed for over a month now.
And they haven’t addressed us, or sought out our opinion.
The closest we’ve gotten is… You, Kweedko. And, to be frank, that isn’t anything.
Surely you can see why no one appreciates being dismissed by… a single player. Who… does or doesn’t have more power than anyone else? [shrugs] it’s hard to tell the way you talk.
I’m happy to have the threads constantly bumped, in the hopes that SOMEONE, ANY DEV, PLEASE, hears us, and helps us.
So his systematic “ad nauseam”, " ad populum" " ad antiquitatem" “ad misericordiam”, “ad verecundiam” and anecdotal evidence doesn’t count. If you support legitimate dispute, critic both side. This basically all of this in single post, like in most of them:
Basically all of this treads is about Selection bias and post hoc ergo propter hoc as i stated at the start, but who care about that.
Agree, some players they used to play P2W ship like moffett, LS3 .etc, they just hind behind the mountain, then click and shoot, after these, they think they r skillful player. But the TRUTH is they can’t represent the most of the players. I admit new aiming system still need to change, but not like what they say. Gaijin should give player a choice to use old system r new system. And they need repair the bug like the cannon can’t shooting the target when behind the obstacles.
Thank you!
For those that don’t read russian:
It was a suggestion to change NAB aiming to one similar to that of War Thunder Mobile.
They voted NO they did not want a simplified automated aiming system.
Yet somehow it still got implemented.
Here is the result visual:
Again reposting this because it needs to be in every thread so people can go voice their discontent:
The recent community update in no way acknowledged our protests. I posted asking why, was ignored, and instead someone else asking about naval events got a reply. I’ve since replied at the moderator again requesting acknowledgement from gaijin, and others here should as well. Continue the discontent, continue to not play NAB, continue to reject this change.
you say a lot
apart from the most that ignore you because they dont like to waste time reading lies
there are some that stop and do you the honour of pointing them out for you