[Poll] with multiple options for the changes to Naval Battles

Which you can’t proof.

btw. no mater of your woes about that “nobody gonna play with new aiming, everyone hate it” StatShark - See All Player, Missile, and Vehicle Statistics shows increase in games played on all boats and ships April vs March despite of all of the bugs and that fact that April not even ended yet.

ps. people flying

LOL I know, It’s his “there must be something wrong with you if you don’t like it”

I see win rates, I am missing something

6 Likes

Scroll a little further.

You mean this for examble this?

image

1 Like

remember my post about the RN Turbine snipping my v-990 from 4klm?

Here, you scared or the zealous LS3 players away…

2 Likes

My bad, i looked at “All Time Stats”

Monthly stats probably not full for april-march, cause i played JDS Ayanami recently ant there is no info on this and NRB stats diff is the same, gonna check when april ends.

Was a zealous player.

lol. My dude. The proof is in the game. Play a match. Try to shoot a player. You’re not. The AI is. Try to shoot a boat over a strip of land and watch the gunners target the water. A well known phenomenon. …you’re not doing anything but refuting facts as if they weren’t facts. Which, I can tell you, I’m very familiar with these day. People making up “facts”.

NO ONE here is going to accept that they have MORE autonomy in the game NOW then they did before.

lol. Not anyone who knows what the word “autonomy” or “agency” means.

3 Likes

I would say that now game in NAB request more skill than before patch to play efficiently. Just that skill is some different than before.

And you :

as you do in all treads, be a man.

1 Like

More ad hominems.

3 Likes

lol.

^This guy sees it.

@Kweedko

An ad hominem fallacy, or ad hominem attack, is a type of logical fallacy where someone attacks the person making an argument rather than the argument itself. It’s essentially a personal attack, and it’s considered a fallacy because it doesn’t address the actual issue or evidence.

Look, there is a large segment of the community Voting, Discussing, Insisting, Explaining, Pleading. These are veterans with THOUSANDS of hours of game play and, in my case, hundreds of dollars supporting Gaijin because of this gamemode.

And they’ve destroyed it.

And they’ve left it destroyed for over a month now.

And they haven’t addressed us, or sought out our opinion.

The closest we’ve gotten is… You, Kweedko. And, to be frank, that isn’t anything.

Surely you can see why no one appreciates being dismissed by… a single player. Who… does or doesn’t have more power than anyone else? [shrugs] it’s hard to tell the way you talk.

I’m happy to have the threads constantly bumped, in the hopes that SOMEONE, ANY DEV, PLEASE, hears us, and helps us.

7 Likes

So his systematic “ad nauseam”, " ad populum" " ad antiquitatem" “ad misericordiam”, “ad verecundiam” and anecdotal evidence doesn’t count. If you support legitimate dispute, critic both side. This basically all of this in single post, like in most of them:

Basically all of this treads is about Selection bias and post hoc ergo propter hoc as i stated at the start, but who care about that.

1 Like

Agree, some players they used to play P2W ship like moffett, LS3 .etc, they just hind behind the mountain, then click and shoot, after these, they think they r skillful player. But the TRUTH is they can’t represent the most of the players. I admit new aiming system still need to change, but not like what they say. Gaijin should give player a choice to use old system r new system. And they need repair the bug like the cannon can’t shooting the target when behind the obstacles.

2 Likes

Still 69% wanting to reverse the aiming change.

image

85% here want it changed as well

image

2 Likes

is it possible to add the link of the Russian forum suggestion where they voted against this being implemented in the first place?

1 Like

Yes. Here you go.

1 Like

Thank you!
For those that don’t read russian:
It was a suggestion to change NAB aiming to one similar to that of War Thunder Mobile.
They voted NO they did not want a simplified automated aiming system.
Yet somehow it still got implemented.
Here is the result visual:
image

2 Likes

Again reposting this because it needs to be in every thread so people can go voice their discontent:

The recent community update in no way acknowledged our protests. I posted asking why, was ignored, and instead someone else asking about naval events got a reply. I’ve since replied at the moderator again requesting acknowledgement from gaijin, and others here should as well. Continue the discontent, continue to not play NAB, continue to reject this change.

2 Likes

we are still waiting for you to prove your case

you say a lot
apart from the most that ignore you because they dont like to waste time reading lies
there are some that stop and do you the honour of pointing them out for you

4 Likes

What case, im not the one who claiming that playebase dropped drastically.