[POLL] Polish Tech Tree

dude, your comments are unnecessary.
If we were so nationalistic, we would not ask for a combined tree. If latam were copy paste, a combined tree would not be necessary. In fact, the TT of latam is combined because we do not want copy paste and we are not nationalistic.

By the way, Israel is not a mistake, it has plenty of vehicles. The fact that they only added magachs is not Israel’s fault. Gaijin is the only one to blame.

2 Likes

Czesc, I found this: PRODUCTION AND MODERNIZATION OF T-34-85 TANK IN POLAND. It details the full history of Poland’s modernization program for the T-34-85 and some extra stuff that the warszawa military institute did researching stabilizers and a new gun. Tldr, in the end the actual advancements for the T-34-85 were minimal and by the 1980s most T-34-85s were not referred by M1 or M2, just M because of such little difference. In BR making I put this tank at 6.0, and possible 6.3 if we can find proof Polska used 3-BK7 or BK3 HEATFS for their 85mm cannons. Hope this helps, I also found a lot of other stuff that might help I just gotta find the files
Publishers Panel ← better link I forgot other one needs to request

4 Likes

Additionally, the small Narew from my interpretation could be included (but at like 13.0 because CAMM is a active homing missile and 25km range). The mala narew has a little radar on a pole in the iLauncher on the jelcz truck
mala narew

4 Likes

Is also made this tech tree on the wt tech tree maker thing, it is pretty similiar to yours but with Czech sub-tree because of close relation in military industry (TOPAS, SKOT, PT-91 engine, PT-91M2 gun)

https://polandgroundfinal.neocities.org/

2 Likes

trololololooo, this tech tree have more sense than China or Israel :D

7 Likes

full support for this idea

Siema, pracowałem kiedyś nad polskim drzewkiem ale ganjin ma duze wymagania co do szczegolowosci projektu dlatego jeżeli pracuje ktoś z was nad drzewkiem w dalszym ciągu chcialbym przekazać swoje pomysly gdyż jaj już nie mam natchnienia. W zipie plik json do uploadu na WT Tech-Tree Maker oraz word z opisem ktory zrobilem oraz img z ogolnym wygladem drzewka, korzystaj.

Hello, I used to work on a Polish tree, but ganjin has high demands on the details of the project, so if any of you are working on the tree, I would still like to share my ideas because I am no longer inspired. In the zip there is a json file to upload to WT Tech-Tree Maker and word with the description I made and img with the general appearance of the tree, use it. /AUTO TRANSLATED

PL tech tree.zip (18.8 KB)

3 Likes

A model was produced so maybe gaijin would add it. They had no problem with ho-ri and e-100.

why is the guy in the picture pointing to the Fre*ch flag?

Oh shit i just realized. Eww

as far as I know this is not radar its and Data-Link antena to help guide missles, even tho I thought so I needed a 2nd opinion of what that is and it an reciver data-link antena so it does not have its own radar even tho I would like this as an oposition to pantsir it cannot work without radar and radiostation somewhere else

1 Like

as real as ho ri

Okay I see the problem, and you are correct, it is not radar. Could not find if it is data link or not, but it is not radar. BUT see this, CAMM iLauncher is able to have a FLIR/Electro optical station for passive/autonomous detection capability, most Polish iLaunchers did not receive this but I did find this picture,


As you can see there are two towers, the smaller one has the FLIR/TV acquisition system. I know for sure this is a Polish system because well its on Jelcz truck and in Polski camoflage. But for now it can be confirmed that launcher can function without Sola. I will do more research on this specific module, its capability is not talked about in most the brochures

It will be very helpfull if you could find anything about the antenas and the towers, and how it acutally works beacasue for now, we know it does not have its own radar.

image
At the moment Im redesigning the techtree in actually usefull site for making such things. For now its only 2.0 maybe beacuse I spended most of a time puting info into the stat card about what this vehicle was, and IDK if its neccesary in all vehicles, and yes for now its only in Polish. So should I put just most neccasry info like:

  • what year
  • was it a prototype or production
  • what gun it has
  • engine, engine power and speed
  • maybe armor
  • and if they are prototypes or lesser know/vehicles that are hard to find info on not polish sites, put more info about it.

What you guys thinking?

image
image
those are vehicles in folders

Yes yes, I did. The smaller tower is an IRST search and and can also acquire for launch. The mała narew launchers got this in there package

u got any source?
for that?

MBDA brochure, more can be found on website.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.mbda-systems.com/sites/mbda/files/2024-07/CAMM%2520family%2520brochure%2520-%2520WEB.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwilgfeRgpKNAxVPwvACHQtyNKAQFnoECCAQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2WZCGgV870FFh-sDInYavb

https://newsroom.mbda-systems.com/mbda-pgz-showcase-camm-air-defence-solution-on-jelcz-vehicle/mbdas-camm-ilauncher-integrated-with-a-polish-jelcz-8x8-truck-chassis-jpg/

Most launcher don’t have this, as it is optional but the picture I provided has it, and obviously is the Polish version.

If needed I have a tech tree po angielsku and it has pictures and all stats filled, I have this for air force and land force.

1 Like

I just submitted the Narew suggestion, I plan to work on the following vehicles for my next suggestions. So far I have completed and successfully submitted BRDM-2M-97, and T-55AM merida (not seen here).

I wont do the Abrams Leopard suggestions, because I dont want to