This is just an unfair lie, the turret could slew and elevate like any other turret and I assume that the guns that were intended to be mounted did already exist and were functional. Like the Kronstadt turrets then.
1 Like
Not on our watch.
It’s hard to tell a lie when the turret is made of wood. However, given that you refuse to believe the facts, I’ll just say keep coping, and to the list you go cause i am not wasting more effort to state the same stuff.
3 Likes
You cope, this is a game and I have the right or atleast a valid Point to demand an increase of fun for a group of Players. Naval is in the same spot even. It is unpopular and was made exclusively to cater to a niche group and requires tons of Fake and paper vehicles to be viable. Should this Naval minority also go cope and F themselves based on your (and others) argumentation? NO! Because this is a game where players have a right for their preferences to be represented so they can also have a good time. And nothing about either naval or semi-historical Fakes based on real concepts, Paper, Mockup vehicles etc is Impossible. Vehicles like Panther II and Tiger II 10 5 can have their interior subtly redesigned to be physically possible, and even that is more of an unnecessary QoL feature, because this is a game where they work regardless.
1 Like
What was the Radkampfwagen turret made of then, you hypocrite? Was that anywhere near combat capable? Hmmmnn?
1 Like
Metal? With a functioning gun? A.k.a. not wood with a Wooden Dowel to look like a gun?
Also it may be worth pointing out that the Turret is just that of the Leo 1A3. So.
1 Like
Well, I find not a single bit of footage of an actual Radkampfwagen firing its gun on YouTube, so who is the liar here.
What about that of the Leo 1A3? It’s the same turret and gun. Therefore if it works ok the 1A3 it works on the Rad (same gun AND TURRET).
And regardless of if you find a video or not, the 1A3 entered service, therefore it had a functioning gun. Therefore making you both a liar and a fool.
1 Like
You have zero evidence that the Radkampfwagen hull would have worked with that turret. Making the whole vehicle as uncertain as the Coelian, Panther II and Tiger II 10 5
2 Likes
My evidence is it currently fits on the Radkampfwagen hull and the hull was literally designed to hold it?
I’m not having this conversation anymore it is impossible to argue with stupidity
2 Likes
Same as Flakpanzer 341 Coelian. But you are blind and deaf to reason it seems.
I’d recommend changing the last part. Could be an effective way to be muted.
Already made a Screenshot for the Archives.
Fair, but with as much as I have seen other people say and get away with, it’s hardly concerning to me tbh
With a turret that was fully wood: i.e. no electronics, components, no guns, no breechs, no systems.
Unlike the Rad which everything functioned for in one turret system on one chassis that it fits on. The difference between the rad and Koelian is simple; one thing existed in full with a functioning turret (the Rad) while the other was a wood mockup with zero functioning parts (the Koelian).
But regardless, I am done here, as this conversation will go nowhere.
1 Like
Go ahead, I can and will debunk you all day and night anyways.
Again, except for the guns the turret was functional in aiming. And the hull was fully functional. I really cannot decode your kind. Why do you give a frick about this, If you want realism then go join the Military. Live in the real world, this is a game. It is not supposed to be a Copy Paste of Reality. Regardless what you life hating nihilists say.
You aren’t convincing anyone, if anything you just make yourself look deluded.
4 Likes
^_^ Yep
3 Likes
You know insulting us, is surely helping your coping case. Hell, there are some infamous people who would disagree and if they do then no one else is backing your claim so keep coping. The WT Devs stepped their ground, and people have said the same, no one is backing you which is why you didn’t make a proper suggestion since it would be denied.
2 Likes