The Re.2005 serie 0 definitely shouldn’t move up, it already struggled a lot at 5.7, at 6.0 it would be straight up unplayable
44 Likes
I get that, but the B2 has no reason to be moving up as well, the BRENUS is a good upgrade over the B2, improving defenses, though thats debatable seeing how IRCM and Chemical only ERA are kinda moot points.
4 Likes
yeah people can’t tell the difference between BR decompression and BR nerfs lmao
and yet the community asks for decompression when they cant even differentiate it.
12 Likes
AMX-32 105 to 9.3? That means normal AMX-32 will be same br with better gun, armor, mobility and same reload. Could’ve been avoided by giving 105 better reload than 120 as literally presented in the devblog. Devblog that promised similar armor and powerplant to 120 version that are also not there. While those cant be changed if historical documents prove otherwise reload can be buffed.
I think reload buff would somewhat fix that issue and will add the choice you very much directly mentioned in devblog that isnt present in game.
Wyvern in sim to 5.3 is nice change but where is the realistic battles change? I think many people will agree cold war turboprop shouldn’t be 4.0. You cant even compare its power to other 4.0 attackers.
Ki-49 IIb Late getting down in sim to match the non Late version br which is identical is nice. They should have same br in arcade tho too since they are the same vehicle pretty much.
Theres also Yer-2 (ACh-30B) (l) that you should lower in sim since early version also doesnt differ in any way and probably more examples like that.
Tanks with cold war weapons below 6.7 not touched also surprising. you can use this update to push some of them a bit up. Some of them are tragic in other ways so can stay like type 60 atgm. Amount of naval changes also quite sad.
16 Likes
at this point i will not even try to explain it anymore… re2005 to 6.0 not even talking about the fact that italian props are all 0.7 too high
24 Likes
Change 2S38 BR to 10.3 or 10.7, still best vehicle to able to pen top tier tanks.
31 Likes
Please for the love of God and all that is holy, DO NOT TOUCH THE IS-6, DO YOU NOT REMEMBER HOW MUCH IT SUFFERED AT 7.3??? We have a balance right now Gaijin, please dont ruin it…
10 Likes
T-54 (1949) and Leopard 1 going to 8.0, Why at 9.0 they have to face tanks with apfsds rounds, laser range finders and stabilizers. I thought these tanks were lowered just because of this issue. Gaijin is once again making the same mistake by compressing the top br brackets without moving the very higher battle ratings further up. All of the vehicles that have HEAT-FS, apfsds, laser range finders, stabilizers and thermal imagers should’ve been moved up including top tier 11.7 vehicles
25 Likes
I get what Gaijin is trying to do, and it’s largely a good move in my opinion, but the US T29 being moved to 7.3 BR in Ground makes me scratch my head. I mean, it struggled at 7.0 as it was. Now it’s going to struggle even more. If anything, the T29 probably should have gone down to 6.7 in RB.
19 Likes
Some of these changes are ok but why are cold war vehicles being compressed? We need to stop WW2 vehicles from fighting cold war as much, but not by making cold war the new compression chamber
16 Likes
the Leopard 1 has been blatantly OP for years now
30 Likes
While i like most of the decompression, now that mid tier has been decompressed, after high tier was decompressed. High tier is now compressed again, and because of this i would auggest moving high tier up again by ~ .3 to a max of 12.0 for grb
14 Likes
So has been every tank with a stabilizer at 7.3 with apds round
4 Likes
You know, instead of posting potentially toxic methods, a simple
“AMX-32 105 should receive a reload buff due to being the same BR as AMX-32 120.”
10 Likes
Air RB, changing BR is useless unless you move up the topBR to 14.0 or even 15.0 and decompress below !
8 Likes
Only two requests: 1. Top tier BR for ground vehicle should be increased to 12.0 2.Give Marder 1A3 Milan 2, thanks.
13 Likes
I know this BR change “rotation” mainly focuses on 7.0-9.7, but why is the Type 90 at 11.0 while all the other contemporaries 10.7?
The Type 90 is literally the ONLY 11.0 MBT in game
1 Like
All Realistic
Obj279 8.7->9.0
Why has the BR of this vehicle not increased? This vehicle lacks APFSDS, but even taking that into account, I don’t understand why the BR of this vehicle is left unchanged. Please do not cause hell like before again.
Bravy 5.3->5.0
Essentially this ship is a Pr.56 with half the firepower, missiles are almost useless with its terrible maneuverability and long reload speed, I see no reason to increase the BR by 0.3.
Yenot 4.0->3.7
This frigate is the poorest of the 4.0, lacking all performance except gun accuracy, and has no rockets compared to the Karl Marx and Rosomacha, not even instantaneous firepower in close combat.
Saetta P-494 4.7->4.3
As has been said many times before, this ship is highly overrated and the current Bofors is not destructive against larger ships. 4.3 is fine.
17 Likes
Fastest firing 120mm gun in the game
Since the Type 16(P) is now the same BR as prior to the Type 16, it’s time to give it the proper APFSDS shell.
5 Likes