TVC doesn’t make it good at anything
By peer I mean vehicles at the same br
Not really, geagle can hope to do something about a euro due to missile kit
Euro just explodes to rafale
Better yes. 1v1 scenario is ehh, close ig?
120D has no launch limits and you get more. (especially in the 16v16 environment this is important)
Unless the euro can force a df which still goes to the F-16 since he starts on the euro’s 6
Do 335’s should not go down and should stay at their designated battle ratings or maybe even go up. Because they both are really great planes, maybe the only thing bad about them are the players largely using these are rather new to the game and they play these doritoes because they might have been reccomended to the new players since they really are great planes, that’s why the stats on these planes might be a little underwhelming.
putting subsonics against a Pantsir is a crime in the first place
2S38, T-80UD are staying as they are…
Truly Gajin cannot stop, they were finally up to 10.7 and now what?
When I saw the decompression I was like oh nice, then I realized the biggest winners are soviets, obviously I should expect that from the very beginning.
Are you going to upset me every winter, should I expect T-14 Armata br 10.7 soon?
quite convenient that PantsirSMSV goes all the way to the new BR but the S1 is left out a full br down, they are just sending struggle bus against broken AA to say that “they are fixing the CAS problem” instead of actually adding missing AA systems
less missiles but way more manuverable
and the tornado went up 2 br steps… cant be real
You need to lower the br of the Kurnass 2000 in air rb and Israeli mirage f-1cg. The fact it has no sparrows or 9ms yet it’s a higher br than the viggen and same br as f-16a is insane
Too bad XM803/MBT-70/XM1 and KPz70 players will play like dogshit no matter how undertiered the tank is.
“hope” is not a high bar
Maybe when you fly it
Doesn’t automatically follow, also, can you give a description of what you think “starts on the euro’s 6” looks like?
So far all your propositions were pretty adequate but this one is completely out of touch.
Firepower: 7s vs 6s reload
Mobility: T-80U is noticibly faster.
Protection: T-80U is vastly better protected.
They are not similar in the slightest.
Do you wanna try 1v1-ing the rafale in a euro?
I have the rafale
and the euro
Also, just watch the damn twitch drops which are live rn
I wonder which plane is flown the most.
Surely not the rafale
What do you think it means, the F-16 has more missiles over the euro and can force it defensive
Guess where the plane that’s not defensive starts the dogfight is when merging with someone who is defensive
If your claim is that the Golden Eagle is equivalent in a 16v16 environment, which is the justification for a BR increase, a 1v1 doesn’t prove your point, and may be affected by individual player skill
If the Eurofighter is defensive because it is notching, it would likely keep the F-16 perpendicular to it, not flying straight away
The context:
Also, the result will literally not change even if done between players of equal skill
Players that play this game for money say that the euro loses to raf.
I’m sure they know what they’re doing
and when the dogfight starts, the F-16 is on its six
like, that’s how jousts end up when one plane has a missile that has better close range perf
The plane with better missile just keeps pulling in behind the one that doesn’t have that advantage
Buccaneer S. 2B shouldnt go up an entire br, that would be over compensating. It is not a very good plane with bad handling and speed as well as having no offensive weapons other than up to 2 AAMs. Its only redeeming quality for ground RB is its 3 tv missiles but there is no zoom on the dedicated view so this mitigates long range sniping that other planes with tv missiles can do. Moving it up to 11.0 would be a more balanced change.
Sholef V1
7.3 —> 7.0/6.7 GRB
The Sholef has a whopping 2 piece ready rack for its autoloader at 7.5sec. After the first stage its 12sec.
Which for the BR is rather long compared to other vehicles above and below.
For instance, ignoring the PZH-2000’s 5 sec first stage the sustained ready rack reload is 7.5 sec.
Also Identical to the PLZ05’s 7.5 sec reload. However, both of these have a LRF ( laser rangefinder )
The Sholef does not… which the reload and LRF already make a big enough difference to justify moving the Sholef to 7.0.
Enter the AuF1, another 155mm howitzer which was recently moved down to 6.7 with a 7.5 sec 42 piece autoloader, also note the 6.7 2S19M1 with a 7.5 sec 50 piece autoloader.
The Sholef & AuF1 both have a power to weight ratio of 15hp/ton but the AuF1 wins with a better transmission ( Sholef <-54kph & 11kph-> ) VS ( AuF1 <-65-65kph->)
Paired up with the fact that the Sholef V1 is the size of a parking garage, How does it make any sense for it being 7.3?
(if you make the comment of: “but its built on a Merkava MK1 hull!” there is 1 single crew member in the hull. shooting the turret with any light/medium gun will kill with ease.)
Have you never fought against a Rafale in a Eurofighter and won?
I don’t know what you are talking about, and a person posturing to your six in the merge is counterable, and has many differing factors, the Eurofighter doesn’t have to sit for a F-16 to position behind it, and to rewind for a second, the Eurofighter will probably be returning fire with missiles as well, unless this engagement is assumed to basically start in dogfight distance.
If only we got some decompression for 8.0 to 6.7 BRs
GBT 155
Ground Realistic
7.0 → 6.7
After the shell velocity of the GBT 155 was silently nerfed in the Heavy Cavalry update, from its original 940m/s to 684m/s (Same as the M109A1), it should get a decrease in its BR, now that its effective performance is worse. Another argument for the decrease to its BR, is the BR of the AuF1, with the AuF1 having a shell velocity of 810m/s. The reloads of the two vehicles are also quite similar, 7.5s for AuF1 and 6.5s for the GBT 155 with aced crew.
