Still not at all in a state where it needs APFSDS shells, its fine as is void having a lack of components in its hull
1 Like
Ask ANYONE who has used the buc s2b and they will all tell you the same thing. USE THE JAG. Ive tried multiple LOAL munitions and the martels have been the buggiest so far, it puts the spice 250s to shame and thats saying something. Be my guest and go try them yourself.
I think its the flip of the die when it comes to the bmpt. My friend has it and gets one shot 9/10 but then whenever we face it it just tanks shot after shot. If you ask him he would still tell you its still a massive threat and pain in the ass while also telling you to never buy it. Average gaijin vehicle.
1 Like
So gaijin got back to the classic: balanced by kd and WR statistics.
The most revealing details being the H-34 moved to 8.7 where it will face the armada of 35mm/M247 with better range than the 2 SS11 missile. How is still possible to think that 2 slow 3500 m of Range missile with poor zoom can be sent to face pulse Doppler spaa with at least 4 km range…
Gaijin really needs to rethink the balance between cas and spaa, using 50s tech to engage spaa from the 70s is not a game, it’s being food for angry people
1 Like
The ZSU-23-4M4 should be raised from BR 9.3 to 10.0.
In the current planned BR changes, many accompanying SPAA vehicles equipped with MANPADS, as well as air CAS platforms at the same level, have had their battle ratings increased. Leaving the ZSU-23-4M4 unchanged is clearly unfair. As one of the most representative accompanying anti-air units in this BR range, it should receive the same treatment.
Although its radar scan rate is relatively slow, it is equipped with a J-band radar. In the same BR bracket, the RWR of the vast majority of aircraft cannot detect signals in this frequency band, nor can it be targeted by anti-radiation missiles. This gives it excellent concealment and survivability in actual combat, resulting in far higher practical anti-air effectiveness compared to other MANPADS-based systems at the same level. Under the current decompression trend, keeping it at 9.3 is unreasonable. It should be raised to 10.0 to better reflect its real battlefield performance.
9 Likes
When i saw they were adding a missile with that much range at 8.3 i thought they were joking, then i played it and realised i couldnt dicern anything that far out with 10x zoom… They are basically usless past 6km as most things arent even rendered that far, or just go underground.
Wait its not moving? They got given a nicely worded letter by someone saying the “operation” wasnt going too well so we have to boost the numbers in game to compensate.
Move XM803 to at least 9.3.
Instead USS Phelps should be USS Moffet (Phelps is already 5.0).
USS Porter and USS Moffet are same class.
1 Like
No . Just check the 4.7 vehicles
1 of 3 naval players detected
Can we do anything about “the big three” squadrons that ruin air arcade at top tier?
Vehicle: AH Mk.1 Apache
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 12.3 → 12.0
Reason: The only significant difference between the British AH Mk.1 Apache and the American AH-64D Apache is the addition of Starstreak missiles. Having this single feature push the AH Mk.1 all the way up to BR 12.3 is excessive, especially when it is forced to face 13.3 SPAA.
2 Likes
Vehicle: Chieftain Mk.5
Gamemode: GRB
BR: 8.7 → 8.7
Reason: Give this tank its LRF since all the LRF tanks below it are now moving to its BR (LRF is also a HISTORICAL thing for this vehicle), there is 0 reason why it cannot have one when multiple tanks below it have better mobility, an LRF and darts.
4 Likes
Panstir-s1 and fk2000 should up to 12.7 or 13.0 ,as they are not only free for players who lack of spaa, but also Almost impossible to fight against for cas aircrafts like a10alate or f4 ice or ajs37,etc
I
2 Likes
huh? bruv can you be more specific?
1 Like
if it get the load out with aim9s beside 2 aim120s it will be better
Vehicle: Chieftain Mk.3
Gamemode: GRB
BR: 8.7 → 8.3
Reason: Similar to the Mk.5 reasoning with the LRF tanks, however if the AOS can skirt the BR changes and stay 8.3 when its of similar effectiveness to the Mk.3 Chieftain, why can’t the Mk.3 go back down to 8.3 due to it being worse (in overall effectiveness) to the other tanks being raised to its BR.
3 Likes
who cause they must not be that good cause I keep getting kills in it
The MiG-23ML and others have had their radars nerfed for years, and Gaijin still haven’t removed this nerf to bring back the MTI system to the radars. There are aircraft with TWS+ at 11.3, and you want them to be 11.7? Are you even playing the same game as me?