Reasons : Capabilitie wise its the Counterpart to the IS-2 (1944) and Tiger II (Nr. 1-50) (bouth of them also go down to 6.3 aswell)
Also it would fit much bedder BR wise with the other Pershing Variants and how one is the upgrade of another: 6.0 Shershing (M4/T26) → 6.3 M26 Pershing → 6.7 “Super Pershing” (T26E1-1) + “Jumbo Pershing” (T26E5)
Vehicle: F-16I Sufa
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR change: 13.7 → 13.7(no change)
Reasoning: While the F-16I does have advantages over the other F-16 variants at 13.7 in MAWs/countermeasure count, the other variables in play like FM, radar, and missile quality/count are all the same. Similar to the J-15/16 and Netz/Netz(Mod), I don’t think having a maws/more countermeasures should qualify a plane to sit at a higher BR than its over variants without having additional advantages elsewhere.
Theres literally no good reason for it to go up that far, this thing literally only has hot 3 missiles, they travel at 250m/s and only have a range of 4,3km. How is this fair that it needs to fight against 11.7 vehicles now?
ZSU-23-4M2
Ground RB 7.3->7.7
The ZSU-23-4 is a beast — it has a stabilizer, 70°/s Horizontal, 60°/s Vertical, very strong firepower, and belts that never run dry. Its AA performance completely outclasses other SPAA at its BR.
Air realistic
A21RB
6.7->7.0
Forgotten very strong little jet that’s good at turning compared to other jets, fine acceleration, an air brake to partially mitigate it’s wing rip problem, and solid firepower
Even though the wing rip makes its top speed limited, it seems fairly capable when comparing to other 7.0 jets
Su-7B, Air realistic, 9.3 > 9.0
It is very underwhelming since the S24 distance fuse was removed and the aircraft needs help it should go to 9.0 to be competitive. it is also worth noting it is worse than F3H.
Objectively worse than IJN Syanon at 3.3. Fewer gun’s, and extremely restricted arc for the rear mount. In return you gain around 10kts speed, which still leaves her slower than most competitors, and a meagre 2x torpedos. The trade off just isn’t worth the bump up.
Hell nah, we don’t need any of the mach 2 guys going down. They’re already way too annoying as they are when you’re in a 8.x
If anything they could go up, their sheer speed is a huge advantage. Certainly not down
Give the He grenades to the 5 cm KwK 38 L/42, the Sprgr.38 has 200g Fp.02 and Np.10 with an TnT aquivalent of 256g thats more than enough to Overpressure enemys.
To the Pz III Ausf.F and J and Pz.Sp.Wg. P 204 (f) KwK 38
5 cm KwK 38 L/42 Aced Max Crew Reload Speed of currently 4.0 Sec lowering to 3.0 or 3.3 Seconds (the fastest). It is a good/mediocre gun, with good Penetration (80mm) at relatively low Velocity (685m/s), but even the fastest reload is 4.0 Seconds.
For comparisson the other guns of similar Performance and size have much faster reloads with, including 1 and 2 men turrets, while the 5 cm KwK 38 L/42 (on Pz III Ausf.F and J as well as Pz.Sp.Wg. P204(f) KwK), it also has a Dedicated loader (and on the Pz III Ausf.J even nerfed by a Ready rack):
37mm M3/M5/M6 guns 2.9 Sec
75mm M2 3.3 Sec
45mm 20-K 2.9 sec (on T-80 even 2.5 sec)
76,2 mm 1902/30 4.3 sec
76,2 mm KT-28 4.0 sec
4 cm QF 2 pdr 2.8 sec
4,7 cm QF 3 pdr 3.0 sec
5,7 cm Type 97 3.3 sec
4,7 cm Type 1 3.3 sec
4 cm MAVAG 41.M 40/51 2.8 sec
4,7 cm 47/32 2.9-3.0 sec
4,7 cm 47/40 3.3 sec
4,7 cm SA 35 L/32 3.0 Sec (with Dedicated loader, without 4.0 sec (1 man turret))
4,7 cm SA 37 3.0 sec