base euro really can’t go lower yeah. So we shouldn’t give it excuses to go up.
imo we should increase the power difference between base and AESA euro a bit so we can keep them separated more to make each aircraft more interesting rather than just one being completely pointless to get because well, there’s the same thing but better a tiny br higher
Yep, that is what im hoping.
You realize training and actually using the rounds is different right?
They are showing the crews what the shell’s look like dude. Not actually using them.
You can spare a round or two to show crews like “Hey, this is our special High penetration APFSDS, only use it on heavy targets” and get accustomed to how the shell behaves, because you can’t safely get training rounds to perform similarly.
Eurofighter AESA with AIM-120D bug report when?
With the typhoon, I typically fly right and climb, then shoot into the frontrunners that are about to get missile warnings from the middle of the map too. Sometimes they just fly into your missiles.
In the meanwhile you can just turn left into your team and notch everything while maintaining TWS guidance.
the issue, is that none as far as I am aware, use the Aim-120D on the Typhoon. Why would they? They have Meteor.
So it would be Gaijin adding them as a placeholder for Meteor. Like we have Spice-250s instead of Brimstones, or 9Ms instead of ASRAAM/IRIS-T.
etc etc
Also, it was like 2-3 rounds PER TANK, thats not wide spread use.
And it wasn’t even used, because L23A1 proved adequate to blow clean through the T-72s Iraq had at even extreme ranges (Show’s how bad Gaijin models British APFSDS, because L23A1 can barely UFP a T72A at point blank.)
That is what I do, but still doesnt change the fact the CAPTOR-M in its current state is at best a 13.3/13.7 radar, but is currently at 14.7 alongside ESAs
PIRATE TWS + Sensor Fusion + P-Track, and now we are talking.
You can try pulling the technical compatibility argument, or go for an equivalent.
I meant the AESA one, the 14.3 one can do that but only in downtiers because people don’t except it, but so can the F-15E at even lower BR
Good luck with that.
Never gunna happen.
Come on, do your best DirectSupport roleplay
Okay. and again, I already do that, still doesnt change the fact that Aim-120B/C5s ARE underperforming, Heck so are R-77 and PL-12 and Derby/R-Darter, in that same regard if common sense is applied.
Probably would still fire straight at the intercept point, but its a tool that can be used if needed. Especially when heavily laden in NE and turning is a chore.
In that case.
“The Typhoon only has 8x ARH missiels, this is unfair vs the Su-30SM2 and F-15C GE, therefore we need ASRAAM and Meteors to compete”
nonono, that’s not it.
You need to use 5th gens man
Euro has to compete with the 5th gens!!
I can’t complain about the aim-120 variants. For me only the derby and AAM-4 are in a poor state. The derby is literally trash rn
Right right.
Needs Britecloud too then.
Its still on the old FM system, so I take that with a pinch of salt. Will have to see if/what else gets that treatment next major.
But in theory, if it has DL, it can be fired inside the radar FoR but outside the missiels FoV
Eh, I think keeping that limitation for most brs is better for gameplay purposes still.
regardless of whether it’s possible irl or not. (I’m dying on this hill)
For higher tiers, removing that limitation would make sense to keep a sense of technology progression or whatever
