better angling with slightly less UFP armor and, more importantly, 35mm UFP cheeks that make hull angling pointless?
All 9.0 vautours
Air realistic
9.0->8.7
Undeniably quite powerful engines for a bomber at this rating but no airspawn. Subpar as a fighter because of quite bad maneuverability. It can outstall people when going upward because of its great engines, but that’s about it.
It can also be given airspawn and left at 9.0 probably.
6 Likes
8.3 - 9.3, this person has literally only ever played three tanks in this BR range and somehow thinks they can go around statshaming people and calling them bad for their opinions. I did not bring up their stats other than the fact that they exclusively play 1.0 - 4.0 vehicles and sealclub in ground arcade.
2 Likes
From what I could count, there is 6 of them.
- Spitfire LF Mk IX
- Plagis’ Spitfire LF Mk IXc
- Spitfire LF Mk IXc (USA)
- Spitfire Mk IXc (USSR)
- Weizman’s Spitfire LF Mk.IXe (Isreal)
- Spitfire Mk IX (CW) (Isreal)
you sound like like this: “oh no, i can’t point and click at a target that moves 10kph on avrage, has a long reload” use tactics, communicate with your team, track and barrel it, flak it and shoot the side which is 180mm thick, wait for the cas.
so if thinking is horrible design go download a clicker game on your phone
Two .50s aren’t much to kill with either. Not big enough difference to matter given its performance.
1 Like
Air Realistic Battles
Tu-4 (all)
8.0 → 6.7
At its current BR Tu-4 constantly meets planes, that are way faster and often armed with air-to-air missiles. Tu-4 can’t win matches or play effectively, because if enemy team ignores you, you’ll never get any kills. Also, there are many fast planes with bombs and airspawns on close BRs, that can reach bases much faster, so bombing on Tu-4 is also worthless.
4 Likes
8.3-9.3 is peak, can i get a bit more insight so i can have a laugh
The Clipped Wing Mk.IX for Israel is not as good as the others but I could see it also moving up.
Air Realistic Battles
B-29A-BN
7.0 → 6.3
The main problem of B-29 is it’s turrets. Brownings M2 don’t deal enough damage to efficiently kill enemies. Tu-4, even with all its problems, at least can destroy or severely damage any plane, that’s trying to attack him. And if B-29 with its Brownings is attacked by something like La-200 or Me-163, it will die with 90% probability, without any significant damage to enemy.
3 Likes
Nelson / Rodney
Give these ships their correct 30 second reload rate. Move their BRs to 8.0 if necessary. They will make a nice linueup with KGV apparently.
(Bug Report that was disregarded)
Developers considered it unnecessary to further increase the rate of fire.
Situation in Naval has changed since.
1 Like
So when will these br changes even drop… march?
Septober 3047
1 Like
Great. Nobody cares and it does not even attempt to address your self contadicting statements.
Yes i am the one complaining not the one who cant deal with XM246s xd.
But let me ask, is it bad for you to get head shotted by a 155mm HE shell? Just answer honestly!
Project harder!
look im like the 16th most active guy here i cant say anything but you are the forum
1 Like
You’ve literally seen an XM-246 like twice in your time playing this game considering you only play 4.0
I am talking about how broken the damage model is as someone who actually PLAYS it, not against it.
2 Likes
i see that growing up will not be possible for you
I hope someone gets you some help soon like a loved one if you have any
2 Likes
Lim-5p
Air realistic
8.7->9.0
Very very good in all categories besides roll rate, really. It and the shenyang should be 9.0.
3 Likes
Yeah, its just one of my usual tabs I leave open most of the time
Believe me it’s not a good idea the problem is not the missiles it’s the premium 13.3 13.0 with fox 3s those are the problem I’ve been playing the MiG 29 since it got first added in December 2022 it was great right until they added premiums with fox 3s