Planned Battle Rating Changes (January 2026)

Turan III 4.0 → 3.7 (all modes)

The Turan III is essentially a Pz IV H, yet the Pz IV H gets APCR, and a smoke shell, whereas the Turan III, with better mobility and less penetration( due to artificially limited shell choices), has to be 4.0. How does this make any sense ?

Either move the Turan III to 3.7 or give it its missing shell types, so that the 4.0 battle rating makes sense.

Missing German APCR shell of the Turan III

Missing German smoke shell of the Turan III

Both reported and accepted 2 years ago, yet nothing has been done!

2 Likes

it has 52 flares at the cost of one pylon. If you bring both flare pods, they both dispense simultaneously meaning your flare amount does not increase and you lose a second pylon.

The flares give it no defensive potential against a MiG-19, F-104 or F-100.

It should be 9.0 at most.

Mode: Ground AB & RB

Vehicle: Ro-Go

Change: 1.3 → 1.0

Reasoning: Terrible and very difficult gun, worst mobility, and inferior armor. It’s not even worthy to fight against 2.3 vehicles in an uptiered battle.

3 Likes

Mode
Ground RB

T-35
1.3 → 2.0

This thing is extremely good for 1.3 with its 2 40-K cannons, and its 76mm, its extremely oppressive at 1.3 and should be moved up

1 Like

Ground Realistic

Vehicle: SAAB F-35

BR: 10.7 → 10.3

This jet only has unguided rockets and dumb bombs at 10.7 GRB.

Honestly, I usually dislike seeing that F-14A being 12.3 or F-14B being 12.7
Due to long-term hatred which built when I was a newcomer

But, IF Gaijin really, reaaally pushes F-15A down to 12.7 thanks to USAF Subsidies, which they did to F-86A before.

Even though I really don’t want to, it seems I need to support that idea for Mavs and Goose :|

Because, with exaggeration, in an exam room where almost everyone cheats, not cheating gives nothing good except some puny little morale improvement.

Hey Iceman! Please support Tonka F.3 to 11.7 for ‘greater good’ and ‘fair trade’. :D

No, not till Gaijin fixes this.

lmao coelian at 7.7 is just sohe prime seething

As nice as better IRs would be, they still wouldnt be contending for their BRs, atleast not with how comically useless pheonixes are at their job

if
but it doesn’t
and even the MiG-29G is worse than the F-15A despite having ERs and R-73

yup thats totally a seaworthy battleship

5 Likes

10.0 i think

Vehicle: AMX-30 S DCA
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 8.7 —> 8.3
Reason: taking away APDS so it becomes worse than 35mm SPAAs with Oerlikons and it is unstabilized, no reason it should save higher BR

6 Likes

Well to be fair it has 75mm turret armor and same reverse speed as forwards, thats quite an improvement.

1 Like

thats true but at the same time its a plane that requires you to be able to aim and know you way around. It is a gunfighter in missile BR facing all aspect heatseekers as well as radar missiles. It even faces the mig 23 family that it cannot do much against if it gets caught in its radar lock. If your enemy isnt brain dead it can just kite you until you bleed out as you are slow and limited in your defensive potential… also most of the models RWR cant even detect russian J band radars.

This

That was to try and limit the efficiency of SB zombers
Ended up not really working, but you know…

Moving the goalpost i.e “I have no counter argument”

Also giving it the better 37mm Aphe round would be good.

Can’t you see all the armour and the magnetic railgun turrets?

3 Likes