Planned Battle Rating Changes (January 2026)

Gotta tell that to our military in the 1970’s then lmao SAAB F-35 isn’t even the name its just F-35

2 Likes

MiG-29s at 12.7:
while the F-15A is even better than the 13.0 MiG-29

2 Likes

If it gets those, should go up higher, like 10.3/10.7

Vehicle: FV721 Fox
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 8.0 ----> 7.7
Reason: The fact that the Fox received a turret rotation speed of 30 degrees (instead of the previous 60) had a significant impact on it.
As a light tank, turret rotation is very important for it. + Let’s add the usual problems: 721 - too high zoom, average armor, lack of original amphibious capabilities (the Fox can float, albeit with preparation. This is not implemented in the game in any way).
It doesn’t belong at 8.0. It’s much more comfortable at 7.7, without breaking it.

5 Likes

recompression?

oh how the goalposts move

Vehicle: FA/18E
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 14.3 → 14.3
the super hornet is already a terrible plane, you are barely supersonic (slower than the F-18C Late in fact) which effectively turns you into a glorified A-10 with fox-3s in a supersonic lobby as you are unable to compete even against R-77s in BVR and have missiles with terrible WVR performance.
Not to mention the F-15C GE having a very similar kit and being just better as the airframe can go fast

4 Likes

M1A1 HC, M1A2 etc.
Ground RB
12.0 → 12.3
Literally the only difference between the M1A2 and M1A2 SEPV2 is the thermal generation and useless weight. Why is the M1A2 two br’s lower? It’s the best 12.0 in the game by a lot and the Leopard 2A5 is at 12.3

2 Likes

Better question, why doesnt the Sufa get its 16x Spice-250 fit?

1 Like

Vehicle: Su-30MKK/MK2
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 13.3 → 13.7,
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 12.3 → 12.7

Both of these premiums are among the best for their battle rating, with just the J-11A being around the same level if not better and completely outclassing every other 13.3
They are literally a MiG-29SMT with slightly worse radar and a better fm + missile loadout in air RB
Not to mention the F-16A having worse missiles, and less countermeasures being the same br as them? This makes no sense
As for ground RB, both of these are effectively an Su-27SM wish one less R-77 but two more KH-29s. At a lower br

Balancing these planes based on average player statistics is complete nonsense as everyone knows that premium vehicles have lower statistics than they should as they get bought out by a lot of new players who don’t know how to use them
Not to mention aircraft limited to fox-1s (sparrows mainly) at just .3 brs lower stand literally 0 chance offensively against them thanks to fox-3s letting them just push fox-1 aircraft with 0 fear of being pressured.

Gaijin, I highly suggest you actually play this game yourself, time and time again you make it very clear that you have never actually touched it yourself, nor have you learned why and how vehicles are balanced/unbalanced. It is incredibly sad to see what you are doing to completely destroy the balance of this game

3 Likes

I can compare them just fine regarding guidance and INS/memory. Even moreso the 7P carriers as they have better radars as well.

Its fair enough to say its not good at 13.0 but 11.7 aircraft should not have to fight it. Better to move up Fox-3 Aircraft than move it down.

If the 2A6 has to be 12.7 despite having Gen 1 thermals compared to the 2A7s Gen 3.

Then M1A1 HC and M1A2 can be 12.7 with Gen 1 thermals compared to the SepV1’s Gen 2

XM-1 (GM)

Ground RB
9.3 → 9.0

The XM-1 (Chrysler) is at 9.0 and is better in nearly all ways, including acceleration and armour.

I think 9.3 is fine for the Khalid.

Why are you comparing it to only one aircraft, try competing with su30mk and f2a adtw, uptiers can go up to 14.0

Vehicle: F106
Mode: Air realistic
9.3->9.3
Absolutely ludicrous performance at 9.3. People just look at the bad missile it has and call it trash when it mostly farms anyone if the player is competent because of insane speed and turn.

J35xs really need this

1 Like

It pains me how the F-15I gets no SPICE-250’s and the F-16I gets no extra SPICE-250’s.

Sweden gets more SPICE-250’s on their top CAS plane than the nation that made it and actually uses it…

1 Like

10.0 is a bit too high for 30mm APDS though, it is very prone to shattering and lacks the necessary penetration to compete