They are absolutely equivalent. The only thing the 15 has worse than the 27 is the fox-1.
t-50 is great
But t34s get 1 popped by every shot in the turret cheeks? And those are big cheeks
1 Like
Which is massive, 6 R-27ER’s are not comparable to 4 sparrows (which can be rolled, literally)
2 Likes
Israel has no vehicles for Rank IX.
I’ve heard many players request that the Kfir C.10 Blk 60’s BR be increased, but that should only be possible if it obtains the I-Derby-ER and Python 4/5 missiles.
1 Like
Whilst R-27ERs are cracked, that shouldnt justify the F-15A to be at a stupid BR
3 Likes
SU33 is better as it gets 8 of them
Air Realistic & Ground Realistic
Venom FB.4
8.7 → 8.3/8.0
It is similar to the Vampire FB 5, but is even more extreme, being a lot higher BR. Meaning that it can be powerful, it will only do so, if the enemy jets chooses to engage it in a turn fight. The thing is, at this BR, most people knows that turnfighting is not advantageous, so it happens in a blue moon. It doesn’t have the thrust to wight ratio to be able to fight like jets usually do.
6 Likes
Su-27 has to move up and 13.3 - 14.3 needs to be decompressed one notch to accomodate it. F-15A should stay 13.0 and is overpowered at 12.7
2 Likes
Su-27 can carry 27ERs and ETs with more missiles overall plus it has HMS.
1 Like
no it shouldnt F15A should be 13.0
and the SU33/Su27 should be 13.3
2 Likes
900 was kinda warranted, it was quite good
Mk.10 was always fair but never excellent
May i say look here, Mk.10 could get 92 more HP
BOTH would get a better Shell (L23A1) (Base L23 is fake anyway)
Comparison
BOTH could get a 1.5s reduction in reload
1 Like
Yep, and even at 13.0, F-15A could be considered under BRed
1 Like
Seriously F-18E at BR 14.7?! This makes no sense at all Right now it should be at least BR 14.3 or even 14.0 At the current state the F/A-18E is extremely hard to play It cannot compete with aircraft like the Typhoon Su-30SM2 or F-15C in BVR It is simply too slow and outclassed Being forced to fight against top-tier jets with better speed and radar puts the F-18E at a huge disadvantage This is not balanced gameplay If Gaijin insists on keeping the F-18E at BR 14.7 then it absolutely needs AIM-120C-7 to be even remotely competitive That would greatly improve balance I understand that the F-18E may receive better weapons in the future but balancing a vehicle based on “future potential” instead of current performance is unfair to players.
1 Like
Some of your suggestions are good but F5 by one BR is just moronic… the plane is just as good as the pilot other then that it does not have much going for it except the speed retention in turns… they are fine where they are. Putting them up will make them useless as they are barely supersonic, carry pretty meh loadout of missiles and most lack any decent radar.
1 Like
did you ever play a single match in SIM?
the HMS isnt helping you a single bit if your avionics are bad
1 Like
you notch and sneeze one chaff and ER is defeated. It’s not that big of a deal when the sensors on the Flanker are so terrible. You can even crank through the 27’s radar without ever going defensive and it will drop lock.
F/A-18E
14.7 → 14.3
The super hornet can NOT compete with other top tier aircraft at all
- barely supersonic, even with full burners at high altitude
- extremely mediocre missiles, with 9Ms and 120Bs being pretty basic in performance
- below average AESA radar, atleast compared to the SM2 and Eurofighters which are capable of over 180* prefect search and tracking
The super hornet is already a contender for the worst jet in top tier, its only an update old, dont take it behind the barn already
4 Likes
Agreed. Since the Sagittario 2 went up to 9.3, 80% of aircraft it can face have gone down. It has ridiculously less acceleration than the Ariete and does not deserve 9.3.
1 Like