Planned Battle Rating Changes (January 2026)

Ground Realistic

BT-7M

2.0 → 2.3

Good gun, extremely good mobility, making this a very good flanker, that can be in very advantageous positions very early in the game. It cannon also have decent good pen for its BR with HE filler, and therefore is able to deal with vehicles a lot higher BR than itself, as seen in how many people actually bring it up into a lot higher games such as 6.X, 8.X or even top tier.

2 Likes

17404033060334059987813776454437
No 13.3 required man

too easy to play totally

Ground Realistic

M22

2.0 → 2.3

Good gun, extremely good mobility, making this a very good flanker, that can be in very advantageous positions very early in the game. It cannon also have really good pen for its BR, and therefore is able to deal with vehicles a lot higher BR than itself, as seen in how many people actually bring it up into a lot higher games such as 6.X, 8.X or even top tier.

4 Likes

Vehicle: F16 AM block 20 norway

Gamemode: Air Realistic

BR Change: 13.7 to 13.3

Change: none

Reason: It is considerably worse than the F-16 Block 40 and 50.

2 Likes

It doesn’t

Vehicle: F16 OCU Thailand

Gamemode: Air Realistic

BR Change: 13.7 to 13.3

Change: none

Reason: It is considerably worse than the F-16 Block 40 and 50.

2 Likes

Ground Realistic

T-50

2.7 → 3.0

It nearly have the mobility of the BT-7M, and at the same time having nearly having the same armor of the T-34. The combination of those two, makes it very powerful tank, where a lot of enemy tanks will have a hard time to even try to pen its armor, and it being able to flank them.

2 Likes

F/A-18C and derivatives
Air RB
14.0 → 13.7
It’s literally worse than the Su-27SM and F-15C. Slow fat plane that has zero battle presence beyond spamming missiles (Which the Su-27SM does better mind you)

2 Likes

F16A at 12.7 is criminal not having any long range missiles and only 9L? in sim is even worse because it does not have TWS and faces the F2ATW constantly that thing has TWS. 4 7ms 4 9ms and insane dogfight performance.

lmao fakout a top tier level missile, you dont wanna 6 of them at 13.0 better just put it 13.3

know better

Ground Realistic

F-35

10.7 down to 10.0

This vehicle has 2 9J equivalents and just dumb bombs while at the same BR as the phantoms with PD radars and missiles while also having the same number of bombs.

It should be a lower BR since at 10.7 you’re outclassed by other strike fighters or multirole fighters which in air RB are 2 brs above you.

5 Likes

It is worse. You burn through ammo extremely quickly,and once your belt is finished you must wait 8-10 seconds for the reload. The Bradley has 3× the amoun of rounds inside the belt,so the boost in fire rate is offset by the low capacity of the belt

So in this case,penetration counts and the Bradley’s APFSDS belt is slightly better than the PMB 090

Vehicle: Cheiftain 900 and Cheiftain MK.10

BR change: Current 9.0 → 9.3 (GRB)

Change: These vehicles should both recieve L23A1 to enable them to better fight the new 10.3 vehicles they will face.

fakour is literally just a skill check
not to mention it’s an F-14A
it already suffers at 13.0
why would you move it up lmao

1 Like

Mode: GRB
Vehicle: OH-58D
BR: 10.3 → 10.7

Reason: Able to use its top mount camera to guide its helifires in while behind cover and substaionly better then the Littlebird in flight performance. 2.07 KDR represents this.

3 Likes

it gets an X, how huge

Because historically they were rubbish compared to SHAR
/j

:D

I can’t wait to see that
F-14A becomes 12.3 in the name of ‘worse than F-15A’
and F-16A becomes 12.0 and shares the same BR with Tonka F.3
:/

3 Likes

Vehicle: F16 AM block 15 belgium

Gamemode: Air Realistic

BR Change: 13.7 to 13.3

Change: none

Reason: It is considerably worse than the F-16 Block 40 and 50.

Yeah u right not all of them but some of them should.
For xample: non-AESA EF-2000 would get IRIS-T and goes up 14.7 so it wouldn’t be that hard matchup for 13.7.
Imagine 14.7 eurofighter with AESA with 5th gen IR missile would go against 13.7 … hell nah
Even the non-AESA EF-2000 with 14.3 BR easily beats all poor 13.3, that’s why they should go up to 15.0