Planned Battle Rating Changes (January 2026)

Mode: Naval AB & RB

Vessel: M-17

Change: 4.3 → 4.0

Reasoning: Basically worse than the M-802 in every single way. Worse survivability, secondaries and overall, just why? Besides sharing the same main armament I feel like it has no real reason fighting the Blag and Moffett swarms.

Have you tried driving the Chieftain Marksman… that alone probably handicaps it at 8.7 at most, and the god-awful radar limits it also. 9.0 is an overkill reaction.

1 Like

i see why they did it but F14A needs to go down same with the B

Mode: GRB
Vehicle: UH-1B Japan
BR: 7.7 → 7.3

Reason: While getting double the rockets is nice, it is still incredible hard to use the Heli at its current BR, with it only having a 0.27 KDR.

2 Likes

Future premium. Only thing that makes sense.

ADF is 13.3

aim7 at 13.3 lmao, 13.0 with them are rough enough already

su27 got r27er which is great at 13.0

F-14A at 12.3 is the most insane proposal Ive ever heard

3 Likes

AIR REALISTIC/GROUND REALISTIC

R2Y2 V2 8.0 → 7.3

Worse than Su-11. Worse than F2H-2. Worse than F-84G. Identical to R2Y2 V1. Slow, with relatively weak engines.

6 Likes

Also can we talk of 16A ADF lacking 9Ms (9L/Is for the Italian one), OCU at 12.7 has Magic 2s and F-2A has AAM-3s at 13.0.

AIR REALISTIC/GROUND REALISTIC

R2Y2 V3 8.0 → 7.3

Worse than Su-11. Worse than F2H-2. Worse than F-84G. Identical to R2Y2 V2. Slow, with relatively weak engines.

7 Likes

Vehicle: AMX (Italian strike aircraft)
BR Change on Air Realistic: 10.7 to 10.3
BR Change on Ground realistic: 11.0 to 10.3

Explanation: Just like the AMX A-1A, the AMX should have its BR lowered on both game modes. With only 2 AIM-9L, on ARB it is outclassed since every plane carries more and/or better missiles , it is even outclassed by other strike aircrafts like the “A-10A Late” with 4 AIM-9Ls, and the “SU-25T” with 2 R-60Ms and 2 R-73s, not to mention the ammount of countermeasures and the power of the cannons.
On ground RB the situation is even worse, at 11.0 it is often uptiered to 11.3 ans turns out to face AA systems that it has no chance of avoiding like the Tor-M1 and ADATS since it carries no guided missiles like, for example, the A-10A Late at 10.7 with 6 AGM-65Ds and the GAU-8/A.
Both the AMX and the AMX A-1A should be at 10.3, since the MAA-1 Piranha is not a upgrade on the AIM-9L (MAA-1 pulls more Gs but have worse flare resitance and lower range), and both have the same ground attack capabilities (both carry 6 guided bombs or 8 “dumb” bombs).

3 Likes

I haven’t played it, but if it’s that much worse than the rest of the Gepards then 8.7 sounds reasonable.

Wheres my lie Gif

ADF is 13.3 cause of the 120s. F-15A does not have any Fox-3s.

You think R2Y2s are better than a Su-11? lol

Worst AESA radar at top tier and also the worst ARH (fox3) missiles at top tier.

Worth mentioning it’s literally the slowest top tier jet.

1 Like

F14A
AIR RB
12.7->12.3

honestly AIM-54 is no where near as op as it used to be the F15A being 12.7 will make it have infinitely worse time so it should be dropped to 12.3 again where it belongs as AIM-54s are beyond easy to dodge you dont even have to notch well

6 Likes

The puma at 10.3 should go lower to 10.0 and the puma at 11.0 should be at 10.7 or at least increase the amount of missiles it’s two steps higher in br just only with 4 spikes

1 Like

I’d slightly digress moving it down that much in ground RB because it does have potent APHE, but 7.7 should do it just fine there. As for air, I agree tenfold