That aphe light tank thing to 14.7 arb
su 27 and su 33 are one of the strongest 13.0s, did you forgot that? they get more missiles+ better ones+ r 73+ et+ hmd? what are you missing? gripen a and belgian f 16 should go down to 12.7 as well
1 Like
Putting the Gripen A and C in a folder same for F/A-18A and C but not F-18C and F/A-18C MLU 2.
1 Like
Premium vehicles perform up to par with their TT copies.
Takes you a second to check.
AIR SIMULATOR
Ki-84 Ko 5.0 → 5.7
Extremely dominant due to best or near-best performance at this BR, guns are not noticeably worse than Ki-84 Otsu at 6.0
3 Likes
F-100D (French) → 9.3 in arcade battle. At the same level as the American F-100D.
1 Like
ItPsV Leopard
Ground Realistic
8.7 → 9.0
Same as all the rest of the Gepardy vehicles. It’s been far too strong for far too long.
4 Likes
I dont know about the gripen a bro. But the m4k could easily go down to 12.7 and the m2k to 12.3
sounds like a skill issue icl, sorry, just coz it doesnt have ARH dont mean it need to go down lmao
Air SIM be just nothing with a side of already strong plane going down for whatever reason
1 Like
2 Likes
J-7D 10.7 → 11.0
NF-5A 10.7 → 11.0
This is what needs to happen
10 Likes
Just fix the guns bro Sweden already struggles aa wise. Gaijin keeps upping the br of anti tank spaa that further pushes the spaa into anti tank roles bc they get outranged
fox and falcon arent the same tanks
1 Like
ah yes, 9.3 for an SPAAs without missiles
(one not even having radar or tracking system)
Chieftain 900 and Chieftain mk. 10 do not deserve to go to 9.3. This is punishment for the good players. Chieftain 900 is basically a mk. 5 with extra structural steel armor and better mobility, while mk. 10 has a turret comparable to a T-series but much slower mobility.
How do both of them deserve to be the same br as T-72A which actually has decent frontal armor in hull and turret, an autoloader faster than Chieftain’s aced crew reload time and more forwards mobility, the only drawback is lack of reverse speed. That’s it.
Oh, and let’s not forget Khalid, which is 9.3 and is superior in every way to Chieftain 900 and Chieftain mk. 10. And you’re still planning to increase the latter two tanks br to 9.3?
Chieftain 900 and Chieftain mk. 10, with my aforementioned reasons, have to stay to 9.0.
7 Likes
Here’s a counteridea, though.
1 Like
Vehicle: AMX A-1A
BR Change on Air Realistic: 11.0 to 10.3
BR Change on Ground realistic: 11.3 to 10.3
Explanation: The AMX A-1A should have its BR lowered on both game modes. With only 2 air-to-air missiles that have basically zero flare resistance and a lower burn time than the AIM-9L, on ARB at 11.0 it is outclassed since every plane carries more and/or better missiles , it is even outclassed by other strike aircrafts like the “A-10A Late” with 4 AIM-9Ls, and the “SU-25T” with 2 R-60Ms and 2 R-73s, not to mention the ammount of countermeasures and the power of the cannons.
On ground RB the situation is even worse, at 11.3 it faces AA systems that it has no chance of avoiding like the Tor-M1 and ADATS since it carries no guided missiles like, for example, the A-10A Late at 10.7 with 6 AGM-65Ds and the GAU-8/A.
Placing the AMX at 10.3 would put it on the same BR as other premium strike aircrafts like the SU-25K and the A-10A, the AMX would have the edge on speed, manouverability and a better targeting system (it should have the LITENING 3), but the A-10 and SU-25 have more survivability with more countermeasures, sturdier airframe and guided missiles.
3 Likes
I would say 7.7
The falcon is pretty slow so can’t play as ratty as something like an XM8000000
3 Likes
HMD ignored