Vehicle: B-29 (all variants/nations)
Mode: Air RB
BR Change: 7.0 → 6.7
Reason: Legacy BR, havent been changed in a while. Not competetive at all at its own BR, if uptieried is DoA. Barely useful at full downtier.
1 Like
M10C “Achilles”
Ground BR: No change. Lower reload speed to 5s.
With the recent changes due to the M10’s with the US 76 getting a 5s reload, it is only fair they do this for the Achilles since both vehicles have identical performance outside of the gun they carry.
4 Likes
Once again, monsters don’t have stats like these.
3 Likes
Rooikat Mk.1D
Ground BR: No change. Lower reload speed to 6s.
Rooikat Mk.1D has always suffered from damage issues. It has always suffered from having a NATO standard reload for a 76mm gun, which can hamper the vehicle with follow up shots. It currently sits at 8.7 alongside the Vickers which has a better gun and ammunition, while having the same reload speed to boot.
2 Likes
Ferdiand and another Germans stuff were moved up in the past with similar or even worst stats. Game need more decompression and keep this thing vs 5.7 vehicles is absurb. If Gaijin want keep this in 6.7 HEATFS and APDS should completely removed.
Im always surprised that they even modelled the Gunsight weakspot
another “fun” miss modelling is the CR1/CR2 hulls, Gaijin have it so the flat section of hull roof around the driver tapers in, instead of remaining square
And they still have better stats, so they should be moved up again if you’re about to move up SU-122-54.
Also, I’d like to see a proof of your claim.
Lol what.
6.7 TD having worse firepower than heavies at that same BR without anything in return. Makes no sense at all.
Great list!
Gaijjn give him a job
Perhaps I didn’t formulate my point clearly.
The key idea is that sources from 1991 already mention the possibility of installing such a sight. Therefore, adding it to the tank if its BR is raised to 10.7 wouldn’t be unrealistic.
Considering that its BR competitor, the Leopard 2A4, was produced in roughly the same period (1985–1992) and is equipped with a thermal imager, adding thermals to the T-80UD seems reasonable from both a balance and historical perspective.
Additionally, the Leopard 2A4 can use the DM43 round, which has very high penetration. With access to such ammunition, one could even argue that its BR could be higher.
BS, they only this proof is the stupid russian stuff usually is ignored and keep his BR despite they should follow the other nations tanks.
Panthers go up + movility nerfs ?
Tiger 2 P and 10,5 cms ammo turret rack nerfs + movility nerfs + BR rise ?
Leopard 1 movility nerfs + BR change??
Enough favoritims for crap russian tanks.
absolutely necessary, especially when compared to other 12.0
Well… they still have better stats
2 Likes
Why the f15 it goin down br 12.7 it almos un olayble with all dose fox 3 olane and you guys make worst in air arb f15 it fine where it its .and shangan f5 still 9.3 for what that plane have nothing goin for it face 10.3 it should be at least 8.7 or 9.0 gaijin there no reason tu put plane down on br they should go up not down make 12.7 more playble every vehicle at 13.0 who has fox 3 they should go to 14.0 and max br in air arb should be at least 15.0 so alot plane have room go up not down f15 at 12.7 it goin be absoulty caos plane they need to go up at 10.3 and 10.7 lile j7d why that plane it still at 10.7 for no reason should be at 11.0. In air arb alot thing need go up in br not down
1 Like
Wasting your breath mate. After years of being over tiered and begging for a br drop they finally did and the very next br change they put it right back.
The 2S38 has extremely low survivability and is destroyed by almost any penetrating hit. Its silhouette is large, and its mobility is inferior to most vehicles in its class.
Despite having decent penetration, the post-penetration damage of the 57 mm shells is inconsistent and often insufficient. In direct engagements, the 2S38 loses to most light tanks, especially those equipped with autocannons, as it tends to detonate from almost any hit.
Against wheeled vehicles with large internal empty spaces, the 57 mm requires multiple hits to achieve a kill, which further reduces its effectiveness in practice.
I can accept a BR increase for the T-80UD, provided it receives a thermal sight to compensate. However, I see no justification for increasing the BR of the 2S38. Vehicles like the Begleitpanzer 57 perform noticeably better at their current BR.
For example, when playing WWII-era vehicles, I do not want to face Cold War platforms equipped with stabilizers, early APFSDS, or ATGMs.
It is especially frustrating to encounter modern artillery systems such as the PzH 2000 or VIDAR, equipped with laser rangefinders and even thermal imaging, while playing WWII tanks. The same applies to highly effective SPAAGs like Oerlikon-based systems, which tend to dominate entire brackets.
There are many such mismatches across different BRs, and simply nerfing or moving a few individual vehicles will not solve the underlying issue.
In my opinion, vehicles should be separated more consistently based on the philosophy behind their design and the technological era they represent, rather than being forced to coexist solely due to statistical balancing.
What ?
Guess what, they still perform really good.
I suspected that you had a massive amount of IRL biases clouding your judgement, but now it’s confirmed.
Nah The T-72B3 was already pretty mid at 11.7, that is why it is moved to 11.3.
And saying that the T-72B3 arena would be fine at 11.7 is especially more laughable.
Lest play to the stats? Ok, SU-100P to 6.7 or Jagdpanther back to 6.0??
How does this notably differ from any other light tank at the same BR?
It is not, especially when played in hull down, its substantially smaller than a lot of equivalents.
It has the exact same forward speed as the Ajax, Puma and CV90 and has a higher PWT that the Aajx.
It is a little slower in reverse, but it still has an acceptable amount of reverse speed.
And my experience in light tanks to MBTs is that the 2S38 can kill in 1-3 hits as well. Im really not sure why the 2S38 with its 57mm gun is so significantly weaker in this regard compared to tanks with 30-40mm guns.
Again, this doesnt differ for anyone, though 2S38 decent fire rate and far superior ready rack means it can still deal with these situations just fine.
So the 2S38 has the exact same set of limitations as everyone else, but with an unlimited ready rack and a powerful gun. There is a reason its distinctly better than most of the competition which can struggle to pen the armour on a lot of MBTs
Honestly, if the T-80UD got thermals, I cant think of a single reason why it shouldnt be 11.0.