Planned Battle Rating Changes (January 2026)

But then you look at your regular Tiger H1 stats and it’s much worse.

I’m assuming you had the KV-220 before you had the Tiger West, and I 100% believe you improved between that timeframe.

Because I haven’t touched regular Tiger H1 in ages, I have touched Tiger West the moment it was introduced.

I played it a couple of times after having Tiger West and with the knowledge I have I know that it is better than KW-220 ;)

Without a thermal sight at 10.7, where almost all other tanks already have one, and with only −4 km/h reverse speed, the T-80UD struggles a lot. In long-range engagements it lacks thermals, proper gun depression, and reverse speed to effectively play peek-and-shoot gameplay. In close combat, it suffers from slow turret traverse and, honestly, not the best mobility for its BR. And if it already struggles at 10.7, a full uptier to 11.7 will be outright painful.

(GRB) l-39ZA albatros 6.7 > 6.0 -It’s a very bad plane.weak weapons.poor flight characteristics.low survival rate.

I guess you’re just proving the Tiger H1 should be higher in BR.
Though your stats in the KV-220 is not as good as some other players…

As I said, either move KW-220 down or move Tiger I up.

There is always someone better

1 Like

I actually enjoy the AGS, I know I dont do well in it but thats just skill issue, but I think it isn’t quite 11.3 worthy, 11.7 and give it a better shell imo

1 Like

Agreed.

First, play 22k games, then we can talk about how many light tanks have armor?

Bit of a firerate difference lmafo

no not really.

7 Likes

Congratulations on nukes, i get 3 a day but i have no idea what you are refering to in your coment

First there are no rules, second more messages in this chat the lesser chamce anyone will actually bother to read them

They should have the same BR as the regular Yak-3.

Facing 0.3 lower planes because having one less Berezin makes no sense 😵‍💫

Sure lmao, like I don’t play both sides and have no clue how they perform :clueless:

I’ve got posts for the GR4 and GR7 dropping 0.3 due to the F-15 placement

Too date, I didnt necessarily mind their placement beyond the absolutely stupid levels of compression that already existed, so mostly advocated for buffs over BR changes. Such as:

  • Fixing BOL
  • Fixing Aim-9Miss
  • FM fixes
  • Missing weapons
    etc etc

But in arcade, it being a higher BR? is absolutely stupid

3 Likes

F16A OCU

I know Japan is already really strong in air but why is the F16 OCU in 13.7.

It only has 45 CMs, no HMD, weaker engines compared to the f16C. But then you have the su30mkk which has 6x R-77s/Pl-12s and 2x R-73/Pl-8s compared to the f16 having 6 slots for aim120/aim-9m with the su30s flight performance not being all that bad (not that the difference matters much). All that and still being a lower br.

Even the compared to the F16C at the same br, it excels in every way.

Sorry - 4x R-73s/Pl-8s

OCU has HMD iirc

i can’t comment on every part of such a huge list, but seriously T58 to 9.0? you want it to fight T-72s and T-64s (0.3 BR higher) that regularly? also imo the premium hornets should be 13.0 already, AIM-9Ms (despite not being the best missiles ever, but the magic “IRCCM” stamp compels me to say this) would be unacceptable, they’re already much better than the slightly lower 12.3 hornets (2 additional AIM-7P, which are much better than the 7M and don’t get me started on them being 2 less on the A hornet) and should already be separated by a bigger BR range