i wouldnt do it though just cause its lack in mobility i think it better to just nerf it back even if its artificial
Turns to dust
Was that really 6 or 7 years ago?
Yeah
Possibly though it’s still extremely survivable even if the armour becomes less relevant.
Here lies the problem.
- I forgot to move the m4/T26 down from 6.0 to be 5.7
- The 90mm on the T1E1 makes it better than the 85mm thanks to another 50mms of penetration.
- The T1E1 has better coax and roof mounted mgs, while having an auxiliary 37mm which isn’t bad at all.
- The T1E1 has trolly armor and very good mobility with a high crew count.
- The Kv-220 is slower than Tiger 1s and has weaker turret armor, combine that with the commander hatch which will often 1 hit kill the tank.
- Fuel explosion
- Non penetrating fuel explosion
- A very very old model, leading to cracks at the welds, meaning very low power guns can punch through the 100mm RHA somehow.
- Two loaders in the kv-220 for one gun. That’s like saying the elefant should load as slow as a Tiger II. It makes no sense.
- The kv220 can’t do anything to 7.0s, barely anything to 6.7s and it sees these brs 90% of the time, granted I only took a sample size of 20 games, but if you extrapolate the data, it’s grim.
1 Like
heh…
Because I hate logical fallacies
Nerf IT psv Leopard, Gepard have 127mm penetration in 8.7, while BMPT in 11.3 has 82mm penetration, is that normal?
this is ignoring the fact that the Khalid is also 9.3, which is a chieftain with 1314 horsepower.
bud stop lying you’re top tier in 2 nations in ground, your game stats are not very good. You’re not qualified to do balancing decisions. Most of your takes are trash aswell
KV-220 has always been a monster at 6.0, why do you guys think it should go down in BR???
It’s an event vehicle, so its stats would already be good.
It only has 54.8k games played, so again, that would also inflate its stats (compared to if a regular player played it).
Though 2.33 KPS is insane!
1 Like
I normally separate numbers with a dash
decided not to in this case…
1 Like
Make it so the 906 can’t be easily .50 cald from 300 meters, make all the Soviet light tanks quieter, since now you can hear them all post br 7.3 at 300 meters… and make it 20% smaller in size, and you’ve got a deal.
The Gepard and IPSV Doesn’t have armour or spall liners lmao
Dude even ULQ agreed with me. You can’t say this thing shouldn’t go down if he agreed with me.
@ULQ_LOVER
@rainy2000
What of the T29? Or the Tiger IIs post their recent buff they are quite tanky!
Just a note the maus has been avaliable to be researched for free several times normally on the gaijin anniversary, it is not an “special” vehicles like the event vehicles or all of the other removed vehicles.
1 Like
Of course he does… because he has it and he loves to play such vehicles:
He absolutely just wants to seal club with it more.
T29 should go to 7.3
600K games played, it’s a premium, and yet it has a 1.6KPS.
It should go up in BR.
Tiger IIs are also great:
All of them are doing very well compared to their number of games played, other than the Tiger II (P), which is makes sense considering it’s inferior.
The 105 variant makes more sense because it’s rare and typically are played by more experienced players as a result.
Vehicle : Object 122
Mode: GRB
BR: 8.7 → 9.0
Reason: It is just a objectively better T62, faster turret traverse, 4 ATGMs which you can fire off very quickly, better armour, 70 extra horse power.
1 Like
Nah t-29 shouldn’t go up it’s just a T34 with good post pen damage. It is not suited to fight IS-7s and apfsds slingers
IS-3 is 7.3… why should it have to face APFSDS slingers then?
T29 has great post pen damage btw – 181g of TNT effective one-shots anything as long as it penetrates (which ~250mm pen is quite comfortable at 7.3)
Less likely to one-shot than the IS-3’s 122mm APHE but has a 15s reload to compensate.
1 Like