Planned Battle Rating Changes (January 2026)

Vehicle:Guichen
Gamemode: Naval Realistic
BR Change: 4.7 -----> 4.3
Reason: Lack of AP shells

F-4F early.

And lol shooting munitions with the guns is funny. Let’s see how often you can do it.

Secondly, pretty sure the Ito-90 has double the HE mass

Vastly better than the 30mms or 76mm AAMs.

Okay, so then it shouldn’t move up.
Not like it’s performing great at it’s current BR.

1 Like

Vehicle:Lorraine
Gamemode: Naval Realistic
BR Change: 6.3 -----> 6.0
Reason: Lack of armor and insufficient penetration of the main gun

F18E shouldnt go to 14.7,its winning rate is only 47% and it have no good thrust-weight rate or good missile,and its radar is even weaker than J10C’s,how can it placed at 14.7 and the J10c remains 14.3!!!

Vehicle:Bretagne
Gamemode: Naval Realistic
BR Change: 6.7 -----> 6.3
Reason: Lack of armor and insufficient penetration of the main gun

You can always watch my stats on a10a late or av8b na. I play those pretty often and 2s6 is only threat to my agms. You can dodge it with simple turns with popping chaff. Radar is just horrid and cant stay on target consistently.

I think the AGS has been moved too high.
12.0 with only m883 and gen 1 thermals is way too high considering the striker and the booker sit at 10.3 and 10.7 with better rounds/thermals. The crewless turret isnt a good enough reason either since the striker has that aswell. I believe the AGS is only this high because it is an old event vehicle and is therefore almost exclusively played by long time veterans but that shouldnt be the balancing factor. So i propose for a start
Vehicle: AGS
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 12.0 -----> 11.3
Reason: Weak firepower and thermals for the tier which isnt made up enough by reload, maneuvrability or crewless turret. With stronger/comparable vehicles sitting much lower in other tech tree

1 Like

Nice Nice Nice…

However… Are you guys there calling us stupid to our faces or something???
You move Top BR to 14,7 when at the very least you must make it 15.0 (and that’s too soft) to actually say you tried and re-rank the planes below top tier as well.
YOUR problem probably is that YOUR fancy premiums are around 13.3 and and they don’t sell as much as you thought because they casually get dunked by the Top tier stuff and they have to be as OP as possible to sell. And most likely that’s because players that shouldn’t play those planes anyway, not that the plane is bad …
Sorry, LAUGHABLE attempt once more.
You even forget that planes below Top Tier exist.
You downtier a mass of bombers in Ground RB … guess what if you did that to Air as well they could be at least usuable (i don’t even play them but what is right is right) .

Put your behinds down and think at a little more, it’s not that difficult to make it balanced…you just tune numbers. Make it right…

1 Like

Vehicle:Leipzig
Gamemode: Naval Realistic
BR Change: 5.3 -----> 5.7
Reason: Small ammo racks make its survival performance much stronger than Köln

of course it’s too op to stay at 13.3 with 6 PL12s and 4 r73s,su27sm is a joker then…

IF it’s moved to 12.7,it should get HD TVD and commander’s sight with HD TVD

Vehicle:HMCS Brantford,Aconit
Gamemode: Naval Realistic
BR Change: 2.3 -----> 2.7
Reason: The survival performance is too strong for other vehicles with the same BR to cause effective damage to it

Vehicle:ak225
Mode: naval realistic
Br change: 4.3>4.7

This vessel, while recently added, has very quickly asserted its place as one of the most powerful at its br, even without the ak630 ammunition the 57mm firing forward is still enough to destroy any coastal vessel at its br and even the few that are higher with ease

Ground RB / SB

KV-220 6.0 → 5.7

Inadequate Firepower: Its 85mm F-30 gun lacks the BR-365P APCR or high-performance rounds found on its counterparts. Only having 135mm of penetration, it struggles significantly against 6.0–7.0 uptier tanks like the Tiger II (H) or T29.

A old outdated model: The 100mm flat armor plates are penetrated by the HEAT-FS and APDS rounds common at 6.0 and above. Additionally, its 90mm gun mantlet remains a glaring weak spot that even lower br tanks can exploit.

Mobility and Versatility: It suffers from a low top speed of 34 km/h and poor gun depression of -6 degrees, making it less flexible than 5.7 staples like the Tiger E, M4A3E2 jumbo, etc etc.

I don’t quite see how this still remains at 6.0

Dev team i will stay awake until you fix this tank

I’m fine with that. I use Flakpanzer, Falcon, etc, like a tank, so make my spawn points like one, too. Spawn cost that factors in ammunition could be a thing, but then you have to ask if it could be abused.

He probably thought we’d be fooled by his chatgpt response. And then they will always use the excuse ‘oh, oh, i only used chatgpt because English is not my first language’

Vehicle:Le Corse (F761)
Gamemode: Naval Realistic
BR Change: 4.0 -----> 3.3
Reason: The main gun lacks the ability to counter destroyers

2 Likes

GAIJIN WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS?
Screenshot_4
where-version-of-this-meme-where-hes-happy-and-the-paper-v0-5tgdgxbg332g1

11.7’s can now see aam3’s, incredible.

10 Likes

these changes are all pointless as long as op boats like PR206 stay at 4.3. In my 3.3 deck I get full uptiers in 3 of 4 matches.

Vehicle: Le Brestois (F762)
Gamemode: Naval Realistic
BR Change: 4.3 -----> 3.7
Reason: Lack of ASW rockets

2 Likes